Picture a story that painted itself into a corner. The hero's uncle died in part one. Part nine needs the uncle. The writers have one tool that needs no restart: they say the past was different. The uncle was never dead. He was hiding. The old scenes stay; they now mean something else.
A revealalways different
++
A rewritenever happened
++
A dropnever mentioned
People call that a retcon. It is short for retroactive continuity and means a change to the past of a story made by a later story. Two kinds: a reveal, where the old fact was always different, and a rewrite, where it never happened. A third does the job quietly: the drop, where it is never mentioned again.
A reveal
++
A rewrite
++
A drop
Part one: the uncle dies. Part nine: he was hiding all along. What kind of retcon is that?
A rewrite. The death never happened.
Not yet. The scene is still in part one and is not denied. A rewrite would say the uncle never died; a reveal says he did not die in the way it looked.
A reveal. The death scene still happened; it now means something else.
Right. Nothing was erased. The reader is told the scene they saw was true and incomplete, and that is the gentlest retcon there is.
A drop. The death is forgotten.
Not yet. A drop never mentions the uncle again. Part nine does the opposite: it brings him back and explains the old scene.
1987married
↓→
2007it never happened
↓→
Readersremember
The famous rewrite is a comic. In 1987 Marvel married Spider-Man to Mary Jane. In 2007, in a story called One More Day, a deal with a devil made the marriage never have happened. Twenty years of stories still took place; the wedding inside them was gone. Readers who had bought those twenty years remembered every one.
Each card is a retcon. Is it a reveal, a rewrite, or a quiet drop?
One card at a time. Tap the pile it belongs to.
Card 1 of 4
In 2020 Doctor Who said the Doctor had lives before the first one ever shown, and did not come from the planet the show called home
A deal with a devil makes a marriage never have happened, though the married years' stories still did
A villain who was going to return is simply never mentioned in any later game
A 2019 film brings back an emperor who died on screen in 1983, with one line saying that somehow he had returned
In 2020 Doctor Who said the Doctor had lives before the first one ever shown, and did not come from the planet the show called home → A reveal
Not yet. A reveal. Every old episode still happened; the origin behind them was always different, and the show says so. Only the beginning changed.
A deal with a devil makes a marriage never have happened, though the married years' stories still did → A rewrite
Not yet. A rewrite. One fact is removed from the past while the stories around it stay. That is the One More Day shape.
A villain who was going to return is simply never mentioned in any later game → A drop
Not yet. A drop. Nothing is said. The promise is left on the floor and the writers hope nobody picks it up.
A 2019 film brings back an emperor who died on screen in 1983, with one line saying that somehow he had returned → A reveal
Not yet. A reveal, and a thin one. The 1983 death still happened; the film says he survived it and barely says how. The old scene is kept and reread.
2Reveals
++
1Rewrites
++
1Drops
Right. Two reveals, one rewrite, one drop. A reveal keeps the old scene and rereads it. A rewrite removes a fact. A drop says nothing and lets time do the removing.
A small detail5 of 100 long-time readers who feel cheated, made up
A whole relationship30 of 100 long-time readers who feel cheated, made up
The hero's origin60 of 100 long-time readers who feel cheated, made up
What a retcon costs. It keeps the series running with no restart, which is why it is the first tool reached for. But every reader who remembers the old fact pays, and the bigger the fact, the more of them. A retcon of a small detail passes. A retcon of the hero's origin is argued about for years.
Picture a series with a million long-time readers. Move how big the retcon is and watch how many of every 100 feel the story cheated them. Made up to show the shape.
Feel cheated5 of 100, made up
Accept it95 of 100, made up
What the retcon changes: A small detail
A small detail: 5 of 100 mind. Most never noticed the old fact.
Feel cheated30 of 100, made up
Accept it70 of 100, made up
What the retcon changes: A whole relationship
A whole relationship: 30 of 100. Twenty years of stories were built on it.
Feel cheated60 of 100, made up
Accept it40 of 100, made up
What the retcon changes: The hero's origin
The hero's origin: 60 of 100. Readers learn the origin first. It is the fact they hold on to most.
Why does a retcon of the origin cost the most?
Because the origin is the first thing every reader was told, and the most stories rest on it.
Right. A detail from part six was seen by some. The origin was seen by everyone, and every later story leans on it, so changing it moves all of them.
Because origins are longer than details.
Not yet. Length is not what hurts. A one-line origin that every reader knows costs more to change than a ten-page detail nobody remembers.
Because writers do origins badly.
Not yet. The frames say nothing about how well it was written. A perfectly written change to the origin still moves every story that rested on it.
Move the control.
Old promise→Retcon→New promise
And a retcon is a new promise. The devil's deal is now a fact of the story; the hidden uncle is now a man who hid for nine parts and must have had a reason. A retcon adds to the list it was meant to shorten. That is why the next tool exists.
Part twothe city
↓→
Part eightan illusion
A game series says in part eight that a city seen in part two was an illusion. What kind of change is that?
It is a reveal: the part-two scenes still happened and now mean something else, and the illusion is itself a new promise to keep.
Right. Nothing is erased, so it is a reveal. And now the series owes an answer to who made the illusion and why, which is the new promise every retcon makes.
It is a rewrite: part two no longer counts.
Not yet. Part two still counts; the player still walked through the city. What changed is what the city was. A rewrite would say the city was never shown.
It is not a retcon, because part eight is just adding a fact.
Not yet. The new fact changes the meaning of an old scene. Adding a fact about the past that rereads old scenes is exactly what a retcon is.
Lesson complete
A retcon changes a story's past: it was always different, or it never happened. Readers remember either way.