Day Lila
Day Lila

Wednesday, 16 September 2026

16 Sept · Biotech · In brief

Biotech · Wednesday, 16 September 2026

Biotech, in brief

26 stories · 28 sources

Swipe up for the day in brief ↑Scroll down for the day in brief ↓

What is moving · 1 of 4

Mid-stage drugs failing

High ↑

Contineum's depression drug beat nothing at day five in 107 patients. [17] Axoltis's ALS drug missed the blood marker it was built around in 82 patients. [18] Sionna is cutting 46% of its staff five weeks after its cystic fibrosis result. [13]

What is moving · 2 of 4

Health money pulled back

High ↑

300,000 fewer people got HIV prevention pills in 2025 than the year before. [5] US rural hospitals were offered $50bn against $1 trillion coming out of Medicaid, the programme that pays for care for people on low incomes. [21] The US National Science Foundation is moving grant money to four topics chosen by the US president's science office. [20]

What is moving · 3 of 4

Governments speeding drugs along

Building ↑

The US regulator opened a pilot on Tuesday to cut the wait before a medicine is first tested in people. [10] It filled its two top medicine jobs permanently the week before. [25] Three psychedelic developers hold vouchers that shorten the agency's review. [2]

What is moving · 4 of 4

Lung cancer treatment rewritten

Building ↑

Zipalertinib held lung cancer back 14.5 months against 8.5 on chemotherapy alone. [11] Gotistobart reached 18.5 months of survival against 10 on the standard chemotherapy. [12] Two China-discovered drugs each cut the risk of death by 54%, and both now need a global trial to confirm it. [19]

Part of the day's signal

One pressure seen across the day runs through Biotech too.

The first psychedelic medicine is close. The argument is over who may sit in the room.

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

The US Food and Drug Administration, the country's drug regulator, held a public meeting this week on how psychedelic medicines should be given to patients if it approves one. [1][2]

patients on the drug dropped 9.8 points on the Hamilton anxiety scale, those on the dummy 4.7 [3]

300,000 fewer than in 2024, while HIV treatment grew by 1.3 million people to 26.9 million [5]

Who is involved

Who is involved

Why it matters

Watch whether the US regulator writes down who may supervise a dosing session, because that decision, more than any trial result, sets how many people could reach the treatment if it is approved.

What's really going on

The US drug regulator is close to being handed the first psychedelic medicine to approve, and this week's public meeting was not about whether psilocybin or LSD work.

What's really going on

It was about who may be in the room while a patient takes a dose: a psychiatrist, a nurse, or a paid monitor who is not a therapist at all.

Why it works on people

Calling it a safety standard makes the question sound technical, when what is being settled is which profession will be paid to supervise every session.

Who gains

Both have built their treatment around a monitor who need not be a therapist, which is the cheaper model to run, and Compass holds one of three vouchers that shorten the US regulator's review. [2]

Who pays

A rule that a doctor must reach a patient within 15 minutes would exclude them from giving psychedelic treatment, the head of a Nevada group told the meeting. [2]

Nobody knows yet

Whether the US regulator will require a doctor to supervise a psychedelic dose.

It has not decided. Its July guidance says a doctor must be able to reach the patient within 15 minutes when the lead monitor is not one, and speakers asked for that to be dropped. [2]

Nobody knows yet

Whether psychotherapy is part of what makes these drugs work.

Compass and Definium designed their trials to separate the drug from the therapy. A clinical psychologist told the meeting that the few trials comparing them found the drugs work better with therapy, and no trial has settled it. [2]

The short version

That's the story in short.

The whole story has 13 more parts.

or swipe up for the next storyor scroll on for the next story ↓

The whole story, in 13 parts ↓

Part 1 of 13 · Who else is involved

Part 1 of 13 · Who else is involved

Part 2 of 13

Almost every psychedelic drug is still a Schedule I controlled substance in the United States, the same class as heroin, meaning it is officially treated as having no medical use. [1]

Part 3 of 13

Compass Pathways, a British company, is filing for approval of a lab-made version of psilocybin, the active chemical in magic mushrooms, for depression that has not responded to other treatments. [1][2]

Part 4 of 13

In its late-stage trial of 258 people, patients who kept taking doses through a year fell an average of 13 points on a standard depression scale; about 30% were in remission after an open-label dose. [4]

Part 5 of 13

Definium Therapeutics said on Monday that its LSD-based drug beat a dummy pill in a second late-stage anxiety trial.

Part 5 of 13

Fierce Biotech called it the company's third late-stage win in twelve weeks. [3][2]

Part 6 of 13

Patients on the 100-microgram dose fell 9.8 points on the Hamilton anxiety scale against 4.7 on the dummy, and some changed by the second day after dosing. [3]

Part 7 of 13

The argument at the meeting was about who may supervise a dosing session.

Part 7 of 13

Compass and Definium have moved away from the therapist model to a monitor who need not be a therapist. [2]

Part 8 of 13

A guidance the regulator issued in July says that if the lead monitor is not a doctor, an on-call doctor must be able to reach the patient within 15 minutes. [2]

Part 9 of 13

Kevin Sabet, a former White House drug-policy adviser, told the meeting that psychedelics should earn approval "through science and trials, not politics or podcasters". [2]

Part 10 of 13

Susan Taymor Sagy told the meeting that her 21-year-old daughter Shira died after taking a psychedelic, and asked for health screening before anyone is treated. [2]

Part 11 of 13

US President Donald Trump signed an order on 18 April telling the regulator to speed up psychedelic reviews, after the podcaster Joe Rogan visited the Oval Office.

Part 11 of 13

Three developers were then given vouchers that shorten the agency's review. [2]

Part 12 of 13

Australia already approves MDMA for post-traumatic stress and psilocybin for hard-to-treat depression.

Part 12 of 13

Switzerland allows limited psilocybin therapy, and Mexico allows ibogaine given by medical staff. [1]

Part 13 of 13

In 2024 the US regulator refused an MDMA treatment for post-traumatic stress from Lykos Therapeutics, citing problems with the study methods, and asked for another late-stage trial. [1]

Aid cuts fell on preventing disease

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Peter Sands, who runs the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, said global aid cuts last year hit prevention work harder than treatment. [5]

The fund pays for programmes in more than 100 countries and published its annual report on Wednesday. [5]

Treatment held up: 1.3 million more people started HIV medicines, reaching 26.9 million, and 7.4 million were treated for tuberculosis. [5]

But 300,000 fewer people got HIV prevention pills, down to 1.1 million. [5]

Why it matters

Countries protected the patients already on their books and cut the outreach that keeps new people off them.

Why it matters

Sands said the effect on infections and deaths will not be measurable for several months. [5]

Who pays

300,000 fewer got them in 2025 than in 2024, and the Global Fund says the infection figures are months away. [5]

Nobody knows yet

How many people the aid cuts to prevention will infect or kill.

Peter Sands of the Global Fund said infection and death data will not be available for several months. [5]

Congo's Ebola outbreak slows, without a peak

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

United Nations officials said on Tuesday that the response to Ebola in eastern Congo is showing results, while the epidemic remains massive. [6]

Congo's health minister said daily new cases have fallen from about 120 at the August peak to around 80, and ten of the 62 affected health zones have gone more than 22 days with no new case. [6]

Cases passed 7,000 on 11 September as the virus reached another province. [7] The total now stands at 7,258 confirmed cases and 3,510 deaths across seven provinces. [6]

Why it matters

Jean-Jacques Muyembe, who runs Congo's biomedical research institute, said the indicators in Ituri province have turned green.

Why it matters

The World Health Organization's Olivier le Polain said an outbreak can improve and then pick up again, so nobody will call a peak. [6]

Nobody knows yet

Whether Congo's Ebola outbreak has passed its peak.

Congo's health minister says daily cases have fallen from about 120 to 80 since mid-August. The World Health Organization's Olivier le Polain said it is too early to say confidently that a peak has passed. [6]

Good news

In Ituri, the Congolese province where this Ebola outbreak began, the response teams now have the situation under control, the head of the country's biomedical research institute said on Tuesday. Daily new cases across Congo have fallen from about 120 at the August peak to around 80, and ten of the 62 affected health zones have gone more than 22 days without a new case.

A buying route for the twice-yearly HIV shot

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Gilead Sciences said on Tuesday it had agreed with the Pan American Health Organization to widen access to lenacapavir, an HIV prevention injection given twice a year. [8]

Fourteen countries including Brazil, Mexico and Argentina can now buy it through that organisation's regional purchasing system. [8]

None of them were covered by the royalty-free licences Gilead granted six generic makers in 2024 for poorer countries. [8]

New HIV infections in the region rose 13% between 2010 and 2024. [8]

Why it matters

The drug already existed and was already cheap in the poorest countries.

Why it matters

What these fourteen lacked was a way to buy it, and Gilead says it is also discussing making the drug in Brazil. [8]

Who gains

The Pan American Health Organization's purchasing system opens 14 countries its royalty-free generic licences do not cover, and Gilead has forecast $1bn in sales of the drug this year. [8]

Good news

Fourteen countries in Latin America and the Caribbean can now buy the twice-yearly HIV prevention injection through the Pan American Health Organization's regional purchasing system. None of them were covered by the royalty-free licences Gilead granted for poorer countries in 2024.

A pilot to shorten the wait to first human tests

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

The US drug regulator opened applications on Tuesday for a pilot meant to shorten the time before a new medicine can first be tested in people. [9][10]

It will pick eight to ten pairings of a drug company with a research institution and review their paperwork in rolling pieces rather than all at once. [10]

Getting a drug into trials in the United States typically takes up to two years; in Australia a trial can start less than 70 days after the protocol is filed. [10]

Applications close on 30 October. [10]

Why it matters

Trials run in China rose from under 1,000 a year in 2010 to more than 5,000 in 2024, while the US number stayed near 3,500. [10]

Why it matters

Mike Davis, who runs the regulator's drug evaluation centre, said the country risks losing early access to new treatments. [10]

Part of a signal

Rules being taken away

Also seen in Climate, Cyber and Mind & body.

The whole signal →

A lung cancer pill holds the disease back 14.5 months

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Taiho and Cullinan presented full results on Monday in Seoul for zipalertinib, a pill for lung cancer driven by a particular fault in a gene called EGFR. [11]

In 279 previously untreated patients, the pill with chemotherapy held the cancer back for a median of 14.5 months against 8.5 months on chemotherapy alone. [11]

Tumours shrank in 65% of patients against 40.3%. [11] Survival figures are not yet mature but show a 28% lower risk of dying. [11]

Serious side effects hit 87.1% of the combination group against 54.4%. [11]

Why it matters

About a third of these lung cancers carry an EGFR fault, and about 4% of advanced cases carry the insertion this pill is built for. [11]

Why it matters

Cullinan receives $100m if it is approved as a first treatment. [11]

Who gains

Their pill held lung cancer back 14.5 months against 11.4 months for Johnson & Johnson's Rybrevant in a separate trial, and Cullinan receives $100m if it is approved as a first treatment. [11]

Nobody knows yet

Whether zipalertinib helps people live longer.

The survival data is not yet mature. The reported figure is a 28% lower risk of dying, and Cullinan says it will keep following it. [11]

An immune drug outlives the old chemotherapy

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

BioNTech said on Monday that gotistobart produced a median survival of 18.5 months in the first stage of a late-stage trial. [12]

The drug is an antibody aimed at CTLA-4, a brake on the immune system, and the patients had squamous lung cancer that had come back. [12]

Patients on docetaxel, the chemotherapy that has been standard for these patients for years, lived a median of 10 months. [12]

Gilead's Trodelvy reached 11.1 months in this setting and a rival from AstraZeneca and Daiichi Sankyo 12.9. [12]

Why it matters

Serious side effects hit 44.4% of the gotistobart group against 29.3% on chemotherapy, and 15.6% stopped treatment because of them. [12]

Why it matters

The second stage of the trial has to repeat the survival result, and BioNTech expects its first look around the end of the year. [12]

Sionna cuts 46% of its staff

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Sionna Therapeutics said on Monday it will lay off nearly half its workforce, five weeks after its cystic fibrosis drug missed its goal. [13][14]

The drug was meant to steady a protein that folds wrongly in the commonest form of the disease, and it failed to cut sweat chloride, the standard measure, by enough. [13]

Investors drove the shares down 90%. [13]

The company now says an after-the-fact analysis found factors that muddied the trial, and it will move a different pair of its drugs into a mid-stage study. [13][14]

Why it matters

The job cuts stretch Sionna's money into the second half of 2029. [14] A Stifel analyst said the company's explanation seems reasonable but is hard to have confidence in. [14]

How it works

Why a drug can help and still count as a failure

How it works

A trial names one measure before it begins, and that single number decides whether the drug passed, whatever else changed in the patients.

How it works · step 1 of 5

A trial names one main measure before it starts

How it works · step 2 of 5

Everything else it records becomes a secondary reading

How it works · step 3 of 5

The drug is then judged on that one measure, pass or fail

How it works · step 4 of 5

So a drug can move other things and still be a failure

How it works · step 5 of 5

And whatever was left out of the treatment is never measured at all

The twist

A trial does not tell you whether a drug works. It tells you whether one number, chosen before the trial began, moved.

Seen the same day

Axoltis named a blood protein as the main measure, that protein did not move enough, and the movement-scale improvements the trial also recorded do not change the verdict

Seen the same day

the main measure was a depression score at day five, it did not beat the dummy pill, and Johnson & Johnson is now reading the other numbers the trial collected

Seen the same day

the company had set a fall of 10 in sweat chloride as its target, got 1.0, and everything it has said since is an argument about why that one number read low

Seen the same day

the early approval in July came before the two-year measure existed, and the number the drug will finally be judged on only arrived this week

The catch

The rule exists for a good reason. If a company could pick its measure after seeing the data, every trial would find something that had moved.

The whole

Eighty-two people with motor neurone disease and 107 people with depression took these drugs for weeks, and each trial now stands or falls on one number.

The whole

The company, the investors, the doctors and the regulator all read that same number, and each of them decides something different on it.

Who gains

Sionna's failed drug was the most advanced attempt to take cystic fibrosis patients away from Vertex, and Sionna has now cut 46% of its staff and gone back to an earlier pair of drugs. [13]

Who pays

Nearly half of them are losing their jobs five weeks after the trial result. [13][14]

Nobody knows yet

Why Sionna's cystic fibrosis trial failed.

The company says an after-the-fact analysis found factors that complicated the result. A Stifel analyst called that reasonable but said it is hard to have conviction in it. [13][14]

The first copy of a radioactive cancer drug

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

The US regulator approved Bexlutry on Tuesday, a copy of Novartis's Lutathera made by Curium. [14]

Both carry radioactive lutetium to a protein called SSTR that sits on the surface of neuroendocrine tumours, so the radiation lands on the tumour rather than the whole body. [14]

It is the first copy of any radioligand therapy to be cleared. [14]

The approval covers tumours of the foregut, midgut and hindgut, and came after Curium won a patent case against Novartis in June. [14]

Why it matters

Until this week every patient given this kind of treatment received Novartis's version. Curium had to win the patent case before a copy could be cleared at all. [14]

Who gains

Its copy of Novartis's Lutathera became the first copy of a radioactive cancer drug cleared in the United States, after Curium won a patent case against Novartis in June. [14]

Good news

A copy of Novartis's radioactive cancer drug was cleared this week, the first copy of any drug of its kind. Until now, every patient given this treatment received the original.

A brain scan drug approved after being refused

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

The US regulator approved Pixclara, made by Telix, for imaging gliomas, the tumours behind about 80% of malignant brain cancers and around 24,000 US cases a year. [15]

Used with a PET scanner, it helps tell a returning or growing tumour apart from changes left behind by its treatment. [15]

The scan is already recommended in international guidelines, and no drug had been approved in the United States to carry it out. [15]

The regulator rejected the same application last April, asking for more confirmatory evidence. [15]

Why it matters

Doctors there were following a guideline with no approved product to do it with.

Why it matters

Telix's precision medicine head said the drug gives doctors more certainty in diagnosis and in planning treatment. [15]

Good news

Doctors in the United States can now order a scan that tells a returning brain tumour apart from the scarring left by its treatment. International guidelines had recommended that scan for years, and no drug approved to carry it out existed there until this week.

A kidney drug holds up over two years

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Vera Therapeutics said on Tuesday that Trutakna steadied kidney function and cut the risk of kidney-related death and other complications, in final two-year results from a late-stage trial. [16]

The drug treats IgA nephropathy, a long-running disease in which faulty immune antibodies build up in the kidney's tiny filters and slowly destroy them, sometimes ending in dialysis. [16]

The US regulator gave the drug an early, conditional approval in July. [16] Vera says it will ask for full approval in the last quarter of this year. [16]

Why it matters

An early approval is granted before the long-term evidence exists, on the understanding that it will arrive. This is that evidence arriving, two years on. [16]

How it works

the early approval in July came before the two-year measure existed, and the number the drug will finally be judged on only arrived this week

The idea, in story 8: Why a drug can help and still count as a failure →

A depression drug fails a second mid-stage test

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Contineum Therapeutics said on Monday that JNJ-5120, a drug it is developing with Johnson & Johnson, failed a mid-stage trial in major depression. [17][14]

107 patients were randomly given one of two doses or a dummy pill, and at day five those on the drug scored no better on a depression scale. [17]

Johnson & Johnson paid $50m up front for the drug in 2023 and promised up to $1bn more if it worked. [17]

Ten months ago the same drug failed a trial in multiple sclerosis. [17]

Why it matters

Contineum's shares fell only 3.5%, because analysts say most of the company's value sits in a different drug for lung scarring. [17]

Why it matters

Johnson & Johnson says it is still reading the results before deciding what to do next. [17]

How it works

the main measure was a depression score at day five, it did not beat the dummy pill, and Johnson & Johnson is now reading the other numbers the trial collected

The idea, in story 8: Why a drug can help and still count as a failure →

An ALS drug misses its main measure and goes on

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Axoltis said on Tuesday that NX210c, a synthetic piece of a protein, did not significantly change neurofilament light chain in 82 people with ALS in France. [18]

That protein leaks into the blood when nerve cells are injured, and it was the trial's main measure, so the trial is a miss. [18]

ALS, also called motor neurone disease, destroys the nerve cells that tell muscles to move. [18]

Axoltis points instead to improvements on a movement rating scale and a fall in a marker of a leaky barrier around the brain. [18]

Why it matters

The company says it will take the drug into the next stage anyway, and named Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and multiple sclerosis as further targets. [18]

Why it matters

Those readings were not what the trial was set up to test. [18]

How it works

Axoltis named a blood protein as the main measure, that protein did not move enough, and the movement-scale improvements the trial also recorded do not change the verdict

The idea, in story 8: Why a drug can help and still count as a failure →

China-only cancer results face the repeat question

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Two antibody-drug conjugates aimed at a protein called B7-H3 were shown at the lung cancer meeting in Seoul, both discovered in China and licensed to Western drugmakers. [19]

Roche's cut the risk of death by 54% against the chemotherapy topotecan in a China-only trial, and GSK's cut it by 54% in a separate China-only trial. [19]

Both companies are now running global trials to see whether the results repeat. [19]

In June, Gilead and Merck stopped a multi-country lung cancer trial after deciding a survival benefit was unlikely. [19]

Why it matters

Detailed findings from that halted trial were presented at the same meeting. [19]

Why it matters

Whether a result found in one country's patients holds elsewhere is the live question over a wave of licensed Chinese drugs. [19]

Nobody knows yet

Whether the China-only lung cancer results will repeat elsewhere.

Roche's and GSK's drugs each cut the risk of death by 54% against chemotherapy in China. Gilead and Merck's multi-country lung cancer trial was halted in June when a survival benefit looked unlikely. [19]

One injection lowers two blood fats at once

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals said on Tuesday that a single dose of Aro-Dimer-Pa lowered two proteins in the blood at once in an early trial: PCSK9 by 72% and APOC3 by 88%. [14]

Both proteins are tied to heart disease. [14] The drug uses RNA interference, which silences a gene so its protein is never made. [14]

Arrowhead is aiming it at mixed hyperlipidemia, where harmful cholesterol and other blood fats are high at the same time. [14]

Why it matters

This is an early-stage result in a small group, with nothing yet on heart attacks or strokes.

Why it matters

A Cantor Fitzgerald analyst called the drug highly differentiated and the market very large. [14]

An obesity pill, and its psychiatric side effects

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Corbus Pharmaceuticals said on Monday that CRB-913, a daily pill, helped people with obesity lose up to 5 percentage points more weight than a dummy pill over 12 weeks in an early trial. [14]

The drug blocks a cannabinoid receptor that helps regulate appetite, a route that has produced disappointing results before. [14]

Between 1.5% and almost 10% of patients, depending on the dose, stopped taking it because of psychiatric side effects. [14] Corbus plans a mid-stage trial next year. [14]

Why it matters

Psychiatric side effects are the known problem with this class of drug. A Jefferies analyst called them the key debate around this one. [14]

US science agency moves grants to four chosen topics

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

The US National Science Foundation, which has funded basic research since 1950, told researchers it is moving to what it calls a portfolio approach to grants. [20]

Alongside proposals driven by scientists' own questions, it will fund four named topics: the Future of Intelligence, Frontier of Quantum Phenomena, Advanced Materials and Matter, and Foundations of Biological Design. [20]

The four were chosen by the office that advises the US president on science. [20] The letter does not say what they will cost or where the money comes from. [20]

Why it matters

Agency staff, who spoke to Nature anonymously for fear of retaliation, expect the money to come out of curiosity-led research. [20]

Why it matters

Some is likely to come from $1bn the agency has been holding centrally instead of awarding. [20]

Who pays

Grant money is moving to four topics chosen by the office that advises the US president on science, and agency staff expect core science funding to shrink. [20]

Nobody knows yet

How much of the US National Science Foundation's core research budget will go to the four new topics.

The agency's letter does not say what they will cost or where the money comes from, and staff spoke to Nature anonymously for fear of retaliation. [20]

A $50bn rural health fund disappoints hospitals

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

US Republican lawmakers added $50bn over five years for rural health care while cutting $1 trillion over ten years from Medicaid, the programme that pays for care for people on low incomes. [21]

Hospital leaders expected cash to keep their doors open; the fund as built pays for new programmes instead, with spending caps. [21]

Announced projects include drone drug deliveries and AI image reading in Alaska, remote monitoring in West Virginia and equipment in North Dakota. [21]

Some hospitals have told their states they are not interested. [21]

Why it matters

The fund is 5% of the money coming out of Medicaid. [21]

Why it matters

Randy Clark, who leads three hospitals in Maine's Northern Light Health, said it is hard to think about transformation when you are thinking about survival. [21]

Who pays

The $50bn fund is 5% of the $1 trillion coming out of Medicaid, and it now pays for new programmes rather than the cash hospitals asked for. [21]

Nobody knows yet

Whether the $50bn rural health fund will keep any programme running past its grants.

Hospital leaders say they may not have the capital to sustain programmes built with the money. [21]

A fat-dissolving injection gets a new warning

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

The US regulator added a warning on Tuesday to the label of Kybella, an injection approved in 2015 to reduce fat under the chin. [23]

Since then the agency has found 129 reports of harm when it was injected elsewhere on the body, which the label has never covered, including blurred or reduced vision, muscle and nerve damage, numbness and difficulty walking. [23]

It also found 117 reports of lumps that did not go away, lasting about five months on average, including after injections given as approved. [23]

Why it matters

The drug is only cleared for use under the chin, and people have been getting it elsewhere.

Why it matters

The regulator also urges people to avoid fat-dissolving products it has not approved at all. [23]

Who pays

The US regulator found 129 reports of harm from that use, including blurred vision and nerve damage, and 117 reports of lumps lasting about five months. [23]

A Novartis shareholder asks for a new board

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

David Samra of Artisan Partners, a major Novartis shareholder, called for a shake-up of the Swiss drugmaker's board, STAT reported, citing Reuters. [24]

Novartis shares had just suffered a record fall after two trial setbacks. [24]

A drug for a muscle-wasting disease, acquired in its $12bn takeover of Avidity, failed a late-stage study, and results for its heart drug pelacarsen disappointed investors. [24]

Samra said successive chairmen had failed the company on acquisitions and that it must change how it oversees deals. [24]

Why it matters

The complaint is about how the company buys other companies rather than about its science. Both of the failed drugs came in through that buying. [24]

Ready-made cancer T cells grown from cord blood

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Researchers at UCLA grew cancer-hunting immune cells from blood stem cells taken from donated umbilical cord blood. [26]

Engineered T cell treatments are normally made from each patient's own cells, which takes weeks and costs six figures, while cells from another person can attack the patient's healthy tissue. [26]

Starting from stem cells means the mature cells all carry one chosen receptor and none of the random ones that cause that attack. [26]

In mice with ovarian cancer and melanoma, one dose controlled tumours and extended survival. [26]

Why it matters

The cells carry a second way to spot a tumour, so they can still kill a cancer cell that has hidden the marker they were built to find. [26]

Why it matters

This was done in mice, and no person has been given these cells. [26]

A milder drug after a leukaemia transplant

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Doctors in Italy compared 29 adults with high-risk acute myeloid leukaemia who were given azacitidine after a stem cell transplant from a donor with 21 similar patients who were given nothing. [27]

The cancer returning is the main reason such transplants fail. [27] Two years on, 69% of the treated group were alive and 60% were alive with no return of the cancer. [27]

Patients had a median of 12 monthly cycles, and 45% stopped early. [27]

Why it matters

This looks back at patients already treated rather than assigning them at random, and an earlier randomised trial of the same drug found no survival benefit overall. [27]

Why it matters

It is a signal worth testing, not a result. [27]

Twenty-five years of following 9/11's survivors

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Scientists at the US World Trade Center Health Program published a review in JAMA of what 25 years of follow-up has shown after the 2001 attacks. [28]

More than 154,000 responders and survivors are enrolled. [28] Many have several conditions at once, including cancer, lung disease, reflux and mental illness, and some appeared years after the exposure. [28]

Responders with cancer in the programme died at rates 26% to 64% lower than the New York State population across several cancer types. [28]

Why it matters

The authors say the harms of a large exposure can unfold over decades, so monitoring has to last that long. [28]

Why it matters

They also say that care with no cost to the patient appears to improve survival. [28]

The US regulator's top drug jobs are filled

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

The US drug regulator permanently filled four leadership roles this month. [25] Michael Davis, a psychiatrist, becomes director of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, which decides on most medicines. [25]

Karim Mikhail, formerly of Merck, becomes director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, which covers vaccines and cell therapies. [25]

Bret Koplow, a lawyer at the agency since 2011, takes the tobacco products centre. [25] Heidi Overton was nominated to lead the whole agency late last month. [25]

Why it matters

Davis and Mikhail are the two officials who announced this week's pilot to speed up first human trials. [9][10]

Why it matters

Three of the four had already been doing the jobs in an acting capacity. [25]

Frazier raises $1.1bn to buy small biotech shares

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Frazier Life Sciences, based in Palo Alto, added more than $1.1bn to a fund that buys shares in small and mid-sized listed biotech companies, taking that fund to $2.8bn. [22]

The firm now manages more than $6.9bn across its public and venture funds. [22]

Several of its largest holdings have been bought by big drugmakers, including Verona Pharma, taken by Merck for $10bn in 2025, and Alpine Immune, bought by Vertex for $4.9bn in 2024. [22]

Why it matters

A fund holding dozens of companies survives the failures that end a single one. Sionna and Contineum each had a drug fail this week. [13][17]

Novo Nordisk becomes Novo

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Novo Nordisk said on Monday it will use Novo as its everyday name, keeping Novo Nordisk as the legal one. [14] The Danish company makes Ozempic and Wegovy. [14]

It has lost more than two-thirds of its market value since mid-2024 and has given up its lead in obesity treatment to Eli Lilly. [14]

The change comes a week before an investor day at which it will set out an updated strategy. [14]

Why it matters

The company is presenting that new strategy to investors next week. The shorter name is the part of it announced first. [14]

That's the whole Biotech day.

26 stories, 28 sources.