Wednesday, 28 October 2026
Wednesday, 28 October 2026
- In brief
- 1US regulator drafts one licence for gene-editing treatments built for each patient's own faulty gene
- 2Artiva stops its cell treatment after two deaths
- 3Novartis writes down a muscle-disease drug by $1.9 billion
- 4US approves a pill pair for some prostate cancers
- 5CDC's deputy head leaves after four months
- 6A UK pain drug for MS runs out until December
- 7Judge lets Lilly keep its weight-loss drug ads
- 8AI chatbots name the same drug brand almost every time
- 9Pennsylvania families build a gene-treatment company
- 10Ferring buys an egg-freezing startup for $1.4 billion
- 11A sea-bacterium compound kills a brain-eating amoeba in the lab
- 12A vitamin B5 relative eases psoriasis in a small trial
- 13An old leukaemia drug is linked to fewer relapses
- 14Weight-loss drugs cut demand for liposuction
28 Oct · Biotech · In brief
Biotech · Wednesday, 28 October 2026
Biotech, in brief
14 stories · 20 sources
Swipe up for the day in brief ↑Scroll down for the day in brief ↓
What is moving · 1 of 3
Deaths in cell treatment trials
Artiva stopped its donor-cell treatment for immune diseases after two patients died.
What is moving · 2 of 3
The cost of proving a drug
Novartis took a $1.9 billion charge to cover one more final trial of a drug for a rare muscle disease.
What is moving · 3 of 3
Empty seats at US health agencies
The deputy head of the CDC, the US disease-control agency, leaves on 12 November after four months in the job.
Part of the day's signal
One pressure seen across the day runs through Biotech too.
14 stories
- 1US regulator drafts one licence for gene-editing treatments built for each patient's own faulty gene
- 2Artiva stops its cell treatment after two deaths
- 3Novartis writes down a muscle-disease drug by $1.9 billion
- 4US approves a pill pair for some prostate cancers
- 5CDC's deputy head leaves after four months
7 sources
Biotech, in brief
- 1Individualized Human Genome Editing Products: Considerations for BLA Submission and Postapproval Management (draft guidance)
- 3Cancer news, Amish biotech, brain amoeba: Morning Rounds
- 4After Makary's FDA exit, biopharma exhales: Signal Survey
- 5Artiva to quit autoimmune cell therapy work, cut staff after patient deaths
- 6Artiva lays off 94% of staff after deaths and durability sink autoimmune cell therapy
- 9Novartis CEO keeps faith in Avidity despite $1.9B hit from fail
- 11CDC deputy director Jennifer Shuford resigns after just four months in the role
US regulator drafts one licence for gene-editing treatments built for each patient's own faulty gene
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
On Tuesday 27 October the FDA, the US drug regulator, published draft rules for gene-editing treatments built for each patient's own faulty gene.
lab tests that predict safety and activity would be enough, the draft says
February's covered developing them, June's reusing earlier data, and October's the licence
up from 50 in the spring and 23 a year ago, in a survey of 569 people
Who is involved
The FDA
the US drug regulator; its biologics centre wrote the draft
Who is involved
Kyle Diamantas
the FDA's former food chief, running the agency on an acting basis since May
Why it matters
The draft now takes public comment, and the FDA still owes separate guidance on how much patient data the first version needs; that second document decides how much cheaper this route really is.
What's really going on
The US FDA proposed that one licence can cover many gene-editing versions, each built for a different patient's faulty gene, and that new versions can be added on lab tests instead of new trials.
What's really going on
It is still a draft, and the FDA has not yet said how much patient data the first version must show.
Who gains
Families with very rare inherited diseases
A single licence covering many versions could let a treatment reach a new patient's fault on lab tests, without a fresh trial each time.
Who gains
Companies building custom gene editors
They could add new versions to an approved licence as a manufacturing change instead of filing a new medicine.
Nobody knows yet
How much patient data the first version of a custom gene-editing treatment must have.
The draft leaves out trial design, and the FDA says it will cover it in further guidance.
Nobody knows yet
When the draft becomes final, and in what form.
It is open for public comment, and the FDA is run by an acting head while its nominee waits for a US Senate committee vote.
The short version
That's the story in short.
The whole story has 13 more parts.
or swipe up for the next storyor scroll on for the next story ↓
The whole story, in 13 parts ↓
Part 1 of 13 · Who else is involved
PKD Foundation
a US charity for polycystic kidney disease, an inherited illness; it welcomed the draft
Part 1 of 13 · Who else is involved
NORD
the National Organization for Rare Disorders, a US patient group; it held the summit that week
Part 2 of 13 · How it unfolded
Feb 2026
draft on developing treatments for specific genetic conditions
May 2026
FDA commissioner Marty Makary resigns
Part 2 of 13 · How it unfolded
Jun 2026
draft on reusing earlier data across gene-editing programmes
27 Oct
draft on one licence covering many versions
Part 3 of 13
Gene editing changes DNA at a chosen spot inside a person's cells.
Part 3 of 13
A short molecule called a guide RNA steers the editing tool to that spot.
Part 4 of 13
Many inherited diseases come from different faults in the same gene, and some faults are found in only one patient or a handful.
Part 5 of 13
The draft says one licence can cover many versions of a treatment, each aimed at a different fault but sharing the same core design.
Part 6 of 13
A company would set limits in advance on what may change, such as the guide's sequence.
Part 6 of 13
The dose, the formula and the package that carries the editor into the body stay fixed.
Part 7 of 13
A new version inside those limits would count as a manufacturing change, not a new medicine, if lab tests predict it is safe and active.
Part 8 of 13
That lets a company add versions on lab data without new clinical trials, the FDA wrote.
Part 9 of 13
The limits themselves must still rest on data from patients.
Part 9 of 13
The draft does not say how large the first trials must be, and the FDA plans separate guidance on that.
Part 10 of 13
Rare disease groups welcomed it.
Part 10 of 13
A PKD Foundation official called it putting a flag in the ground.
Part 11 of 13
It came out on the second day of a rare disease summit run by NORD, a US patient group, where the heads of the FDA and NIH were due to speak.
Part 12 of 13
The FDA is run by an acting head, Kyle Diamantas, since its commissioner Marty Makary resigned in May.
Part 13 of 13
The draft is open for public comment and is not yet in force.
4 sources
US regulator drafts one licence for gene-editing treatments built for each patient's own faulty gene
- 1Individualized Human Genome Editing Products: Considerations for BLA Submission and Postapproval Management (draft guidance)
- 2FDA offers new details on quicker approval pathway for personalized gene therapies
- 3Cancer news, Amish biotech, brain amoeba: Morning Rounds
- 4After Makary's FDA exit, biopharma exhales: Signal Survey
The full story
US regulator drafts one licence for gene-editing treatments built for each patient's own faulty gene
On Tuesday 27 October the FDA, the US drug regulator, published draft rules for gene-editing treatments built for each patient's own faulty gene.
Gene editing changes DNA at a chosen spot inside a person's cells. A short molecule called a guide RNA steers the editing tool to that spot.
Many inherited diseases come from different faults in the same gene, and some faults are found in only one patient or a handful.
The draft says one licence can cover many versions of a treatment, each aimed at a different fault but sharing the same core design.
A company would set limits in advance on what may change, such as the guide's sequence. The dose, the formula and the package that carries the editor into the body stay fixed.
A new version inside those limits would count as a manufacturing change, not a new medicine, if lab tests predict it is safe and active.
That lets a company add versions on lab data without new clinical trials, the FDA wrote.
The limits themselves must still rest on data from patients. The draft does not say how large the first trials must be, and the FDA plans separate guidance on that.
Rare disease groups welcomed it. A PKD Foundation official called it putting a flag in the ground.
It came out on the second day of a rare disease summit run by NORD, a US patient group, where the heads of the FDA and NIH were due to speak.
The FDA is run by an acting head, Kyle Diamantas, since its commissioner Marty Makary resigned in May.
The draft is open for public comment and is not yet in force.
Why it matters. The draft now takes public comment, and the FDA still owes separate guidance on how much patient data the first version needs; that second document decides how much cheaper this route really is.
Artiva stops its cell treatment after two deaths
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
Artiva Biotherapeutics, a San Diego biotech, stopped work on Tuesday on AlloNK, a treatment made from donors' natural killer cells, a kind of immune cell.
It was being tested in rheumatoid arthritis and other immune diseases.
One patient died of brain damage that a safety review linked to fludarabine, a chemotherapy drug given first to make room for the new cells.
A second died suddenly about two months after starting, cause unknown.
Why it matters
Artiva is the third company to report deaths in a cell treatment for immune diseases, after Novartis and Bristol Myers Squibb.
Why it matters
Fludarabine is given before many cell treatments, so Artiva says it will publish the case for others to study.
Who pays
Artiva's staff
The company is cutting 94% of its workforce after stopping its main treatment.
Nobody knows yet
What killed the second patient in Artiva's trial.
The cause of the sudden death has not been determined.
Nobody knows yet
Whether fludarabine adds risk across other cell treatments.
It is given before many of them, and Artiva has only promised to publish the details of its case.
4 sources
Artiva stops its cell treatment after two deaths
- 5Artiva to quit autoimmune cell therapy work, cut staff after patient deaths
- 6Artiva lays off 94% of staff after deaths and durability sink autoimmune cell therapy
- 7Artiva to discontinue cell therapy after two patient deaths, cut workforce by 94%
- 8Artiva Axes 94% of Workforce, Weighs Strategic Alternatives After Two Patients in Phase IIa Trial Die
The full story
Artiva stops its cell treatment after two deaths
Artiva Biotherapeutics, a San Diego biotech, stopped work on Tuesday on AlloNK, a treatment made from donors' natural killer cells, a kind of immune cell.
Why it matters. Artiva is the third company to report deaths in a cell treatment for immune diseases, after Novartis and Bristol Myers Squibb.
Novartis writes down a muscle-disease drug by $1.9 billion
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
Novartis, the Swiss drugmaker, took a $1.9 billion charge on del-desiran, a drug for myotonic dystrophy type 1, a rare disease that wastes muscles.
The drug failed its final trial last month.
On a results call on Tuesday, chief executive Vas Narasimhan called the failure a bump.
Why it matters
Two more drugs from the same purchase are still moving: one in a final trial for another muscle disease, and one under a fast FDA review for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
How it works
Why proving a drug works costs each patient more when the disease is rare
How it works
Much of the cost of testing and approving a medicine stays the same however many people need it, so each patient's share grows when the disease is rare.
How it works · step 1 of 5
Proving a drug works takes trials, factories and checks
How it works · step 2 of 5
Much of that bill stays the same for 500 patients or 5 million
How it works · step 3 of 5
Each patient's share is the bill divided by the patients
How it works · step 4 of 5
For a rare disease the share is huge, so firms walk away
How it works · step 5 of 5
Cheaper proof, or owners who need no profit, can bring it back
The twist
Many rare diseases could be treated, but too few patients share the cost of proving the treatment works.
The picture
Made-up numbers. The same $100 million bill for proving a drug, split per patient for a rare disease and for a common one.
Seen the same day
One more final trial in a rare muscle disease cost Novartis a $1.9 billion charge, and only a small group of patients can buy the drug that pays it back.
Seen the same day
Drugmakers dropped treatments for these families' rare diseases because too few patients would make a profit, so the families are building an owner that needs none.
The catch
Cheaper proof also means fewer checks, and a lab test can miss a harm that only shows up in a living patient.
The whole
A family in Lancaster County, a reviewer at the FDA and an investor choosing which drug to fund each see one part of this bill.
The whole
Someone with a common illness rarely sees it at all, because millions of other patients share their part.
Who pays
Patients waiting for a drug for myotonic dystrophy
Del-desiran needs another final trial, which Novartis says takes extra time and money.
Who pays
Novartis
It took a $1.9 billion charge on a drug from its $12 billion purchase of Avidity.
Nobody knows yet
Whether del-desiran can pass a second final trial.
Novartis says it saw signs of activity on other measures, but the trial's main goal was missed.
1 source
Novartis writes down a muscle-disease drug by $1.9 billion
The full story
Novartis writes down a muscle-disease drug by $1.9 billion
Novartis, the Swiss drugmaker, took a $1.9 billion charge on del-desiran, a drug for myotonic dystrophy type 1, a rare disease that wastes muscles.
Why it matters. Two more drugs from the same purchase are still moving: one in a final trial for another muscle disease, and one under a fast FDA review for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
US approves a pill pair for some prostate cancers
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
The FDA approved Pfizer's talazoparib, sold as Talzenna, with the hormone-blocking drug enzalutamide on 26 October.
It is for prostate cancer that has spread and carries faults in genes that repair DNA, found by an approved test.
In a trial of 599 men, adding talazoparib cut the risk of the cancer growing or death by 52%.
Why it matters
It is approved for men whose cancer has not yet had, or still responds to, drugs that block male hormones.
Good news
Men with prostate cancer that carries faults in DNA-repair genes have a newly approved US treatment: in a trial of 599 men, adding talazoparib to enzalutamide cut the risk of the cancer growing or death by 52%.
1 source
US approves a pill pair for some prostate cancers
The full story
US approves a pill pair for some prostate cancers
The FDA approved Pfizer's talazoparib, sold as Talzenna, with the hormone-blocking drug enzalutamide on 26 October.
Why it matters. It is approved for men whose cancer has not yet had, or still responds to, drugs that block male hormones.
CDC's deputy head leaves after four months
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
Jennifer Shuford, deputy director and chief medical officer of the CDC, the US disease-control agency, is leaving.
President Trump appointed her in April, after she ran Texas's health department, and she started in June.
She said she wants more time with her family.
Satish Pillai will act in her place.
Why it matters
The CDC has lost a third of its workforce and is facing 48 measles outbreaks, the Guardian reports.
Why it matters
Only half of people in the US trust its health advice, a recent survey found.
Nobody knows yet
Why Jennifer Shuford is leaving the CDC, and how long she served.
She cites family, while the Washington Post's sources point to a clash over vaccine advice. Scientific American says she leaves after four months in the role, the Guardian after six.
Part of a signal
US agencies left short of people
Seen in 3 of the 12 beats
Also seen in Climate and Mind & body.
Each agency now runs with fewer people or with an acting boss.
The whole signal →2 sources
CDC's deputy head leaves after four months
The full story
CDC's deputy head leaves after four months
Jennifer Shuford, deputy director and chief medical officer of the CDC, the US disease-control agency, is leaving.
Why it matters. The CDC has lost a third of its workforce and is facing 48 measles outbreaks, the Guardian reports.
A UK pain drug for MS runs out until December
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
Nabilone, a drug used to ease pain in multiple sclerosis, is out of stock at wholesalers across the UK, Northern Ireland's health department said.
In MS the immune system attacks the coating around nerves.
Jill Kenning, who has taken it for 17 years, has spent most days in bed since running out.
Why it matters
The department would not say why supply stopped, calling it commercially sensitive.
Why it matters
Medicines in short supply in the UK reached 157 this week, up from 107 in January, by the MIMS tracker.
Who pays
People with MS in the UK who rely on Nabilone
Both doses are out of stock until December, and one patient has been in hospital after alternatives failed.
Nobody knows yet
Why Nabilone ran out across the UK.
Northern Ireland's health department called the reason commercially sensitive and would not give it.
1 source
A UK pain drug for MS runs out until December
The full story
A UK pain drug for MS runs out until December
Nabilone, a drug used to ease pain in multiple sclerosis, is out of stock at wholesalers across the UK, Northern Ireland's health department said.
Why it matters. The department would not say why supply stopped, calling it commercially sensitive.
Judge lets Lilly keep its weight-loss drug ads
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
A US federal judge, Zahid Quraishi, refused on Monday to block Eli Lilly's adverts comparing its Zepbound with Novo Nordisk's Wegovy.
Novo, the Danish maker of Wegovy, said the ads leaned on an older head-to-head trial and ignored a newer, higher dose of Wegovy.
The judge found Wegovy prescriptions did not fall while the ads ran.
Why it matters
The ruling only refuses an early ban, so Novo's claim that the ads mislead is still undecided.
Why it matters
Analysts expect sales of weight-loss drugs to pass $100 billion a year by 2030.
Why it works on people
An advert saying one drug beat another in a head-to-head trial sounds final, even when the doses compared were not the newest ones.
Who gains
Eli Lilly
Its adverts comparing Zepbound with Wegovy can keep running while Novo's case goes on.
Nobody knows yet
Whether Lilly's adverts are misleading.
The judge only refused an early ban, and Novo says the main question is still open.
1 source
Judge lets Lilly keep its weight-loss drug ads
The full story
Judge lets Lilly keep its weight-loss drug ads
A US federal judge, Zahid Quraishi, refused on Monday to block Eli Lilly's adverts comparing its Zepbound with Novo Nordisk's Wegovy.
Why it matters. The ruling only refuses an early ban, so Novo's claim that the ads mislead is still undecided.
AI chatbots name the same drug brand almost every time
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
Researchers asked five AI chatbots, including GPT-5.4 and Claude Sonnet 4.6, to recommend medicines for 177,120 made-up patients, in a study in Nature Health on 26 October.
- The top product97.5%
- Every other product2.5%
Each case named a disease and a medicine that several approved products contain.
The picks differed from what US doctors actually prescribe and often cost more.
Why it matters
About a fifth of US adults already use such chatbots to look up health information, the authors note.
Why it matters
When told to prefer the cheapest or generic product, the chatbots often switched to a generic one.
Who gains
Makers of the brands chatbots name
Five chatbots put one product first 97.5% of the time on average, often a dearer one.
Who pays
Patients and insurers paying for medicines chosen by chatbots
The chatbots' picks often carried higher projected costs than what doctors actually prescribe.
1 source
AI chatbots name the same drug brand almost every time
The full story
AI chatbots name the same drug brand almost every time
Researchers asked five AI chatbots, including GPT-5.4 and Claude Sonnet 4.6, to recommend medicines for 177,120 made-up patients, in a study in Nature Health on 26 October.
- The top product97.5%
- Every other product2.5%
Why it matters. About a fifth of US adults already use such chatbots to look up health information, the authors note.
Pennsylvania families build a gene-treatment company
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
Kevin Strauss, a doctor who treats Amish and Mennonite families in Pennsylvania, is building a biotech company by and for them, STAT reports.
These communities are hit by an unusual set of rare diseases.
The company aims to revive treatments that drugmakers dropped or left in university freezers, often because too few patients would make a profit.
Strauss's team gave a gene treatment to a calf with a cattle form of maple syrup urine disease, and she is now a healthy five-year-old heifer.
None of his patients has had it yet, even in a trial.
Why it matters
The FDA draft in today's lead lets new versions of a treatment skip new trials.
Why it matters
This company tries a second route: owners who will pay for a medicine that would never make money.
How it works
Drugmakers dropped treatments for these families' rare diseases because too few patients would make a profit, so the families are building an owner that needs none.
The idea, in story 3: Why proving a drug works costs each patient more when the disease is rare →Good news
A calf in Pennsylvania with a cattle form of maple syrup urine disease was given a new gene treatment, and she is now a healthy five-year-old heifer.
3 sources
Pennsylvania families build a gene-treatment company
The full story
Pennsylvania families build a gene-treatment company
Kevin Strauss, a doctor who treats Amish and Mennonite families in Pennsylvania, is building a biotech company by and for them, STAT reports.
Why it matters. The FDA draft in today's lead lets new versions of a treatment skip new trials.
Ferring buys an egg-freezing startup for $1.4 billion
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
Ferring Pharmaceuticals, a privately held Swiss maker of drugs for IVF, the treatment that joins egg and sperm outside the body, signed a $1.4 billion deal on Tuesday to buy Gameto.
Gameto, a biotech, is best known for a product meant to improve egg freezing and fertility for women.
Ferring plans to sell it through its reach into fertility clinics around the world.
Why it matters
The product still needs approval from the FDA, so the price is a bet on an approval that has not happened.
Who gains
Ferring
It gets Gameto's egg-freezing product to sell through its fertility-clinic network, if the FDA approves it.
1 source
Ferring buys an egg-freezing startup for $1.4 billion
The full story
Ferring buys an egg-freezing startup for $1.4 billion
Ferring Pharmaceuticals, a privately held Swiss maker of drugs for IVF, the treatment that joins egg and sperm outside the body, signed a $1.4 billion deal on Tuesday to buy Gameto.
Why it matters. The product still needs approval from the FDA, so the price is a bet on an approval that has not happened.
A sea-bacterium compound kills a brain-eating amoeba in the lab
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
Researchers isolated a compound from a marine bacterium that killed several strains of Naegleria fowleri faster than the current treatment, in lab tests.
N. fowleri is a tiny parasite that lives in warm fresh water and can infect the brain.
Why it matters
The team's next step is to test whether the compound can cross from the blood into the brain.
Good news
In lab tests, a compound from a sea bacterium killed several strains of the brain-eating amoeba Naegleria fowleri faster than the current treatment.
1 source
A sea-bacterium compound kills a brain-eating amoeba in the lab
The full story
A sea-bacterium compound kills a brain-eating amoeba in the lab
Researchers isolated a compound from a marine bacterium that killed several strains of Naegleria fowleri faster than the current treatment, in lab tests.
Why it matters. The team's next step is to test whether the compound can cross from the blood into the brain.
A vitamin B5 relative eases psoriasis in a small trial
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
Researchers in Beijing found that pantethine, a form of vitamin B5 sold as a supplement, calmed the immune cells that drive psoriasis, a skin disease.
12 of 24
patients who also took pantethine
It stopped psoriasis developing in mice.
Those on pantethine improved more, especially if they started with high cholesterol.
Why it matters
The lead researcher calls the trial a sign the idea can be tested, not proof of how it works.
Good news
In a 12-week trial in Beijing, 24 psoriasis patients used the same skin ointment, and the half who also took pantethine improved more.
1 source
A vitamin B5 relative eases psoriasis in a small trial
The full story
A vitamin B5 relative eases psoriasis in a small trial
Researchers in Beijing found that pantethine, a form of vitamin B5 sold as a supplement, calmed the immune cells that drive psoriasis, a skin disease.
12 of 24
patients who also took pantethine
Why it matters. The lead researcher calls the trial a sign the idea can be tested, not proof of how it works.
An old leukaemia drug is linked to fewer relapses
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
A study from one hospital looked back at 496 adults with acute myeloid leukaemia, a fast-growing blood cancer.
Some had been given gemtuzumab ozogamicin, an antibody that carries a poison into cancer cells, in three small doses with chemotherapy.
Where the cancer had a change in a gene called NPM1, 57.9% of those on the drug were alive without relapse at two years, against 36.0% without it.
Liver damage was no more common.
Why it matters
The patients were not split at random, and those who got the drug were younger with less risky cancers.
Why it matters
So the gap may partly come from who received it, which only a randomised trial can settle.
1 source
An old leukaemia drug is linked to fewer relapses
The full story
An old leukaemia drug is linked to fewer relapses
A study from one hospital looked back at 496 adults with acute myeloid leukaemia, a fast-growing blood cancer.
Why it matters. The patients were not split at random, and those who got the drug were younger with less risky cancers.
Weight-loss drugs cut demand for liposuction
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
Liposuction fell 11.4% worldwide in 2025, after a 12.6% fall the year before, in a survey by the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.
It asked more than 2,900 surgeons in 51 countries.
Surgeons in Dubai told The National that weight-loss drugs are a big reason.
Why it matters
One Dubai surgeon said the drugs are also creating a new group of patients, who want their face and body reshaped after losing weight.
1 source
Weight-loss drugs cut demand for liposuction
The full story
Weight-loss drugs cut demand for liposuction
Liposuction fell 11.4% worldwide in 2025, after a 12.6% fall the year before, in a survey by the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.
Why it matters. One Dubai surgeon said the drugs are also creating a new group of patients, who want their face and body reshaped after losing weight.
That's the whole Biotech day.
14 stories, 20 sources.