Day Lila
Day Lila

Thursday, 17 September 2026

17 Sept · Tech · In brief

Tech · Thursday, 17 September 2026

Tech, in brief

19 stories · 31 sources

Swipe up for the day in brief ↑Scroll down for the day in brief ↓

What is moving · 1 of 4

Companies cutting staff costs

High ↑

Oracle, a big business-software company, began new layoffs days after revenue rose about 30%. [9] Reach, publisher of the Daily Mirror, is cutting 220 newsroom jobs after Google traffic fell 46%. [10] Wipro moved 20,000 workers' worth of work to AI. [3]

What is moving · 2 of 4

Bosses refusing to slow AI

Building ↑

Jensen Huang of Nvidia, the main maker of AI chips, called a legal waiver for slowing AI unnecessary. [11] Mark Zuckerberg of Meta said each lab already has reason to build safely, without new rules. [14] The US House Speaker said there can be no pause on AI. [16]

What is moving · 3 of 4

AI paid for with borrowed money

Building ↑

Insuring big cloud companies' bonds against default now costs more than insuring bank bonds. [18] JPMorgan expects Meta to spend $65bn to $75bn a year more than it earns in 2027 and 2028. [19] Oracle spent $28.5bn on buildings and equipment in one quarter. [8]

What is moving · 4 of 4

Governments setting rules for tech

Building ↑

A US judge ordered Google to share ad auction data with websites. [7] Florida sued Netflix over data it collects on children. [25] The European Commission is due to present a child online-safety law on Thursday. [24]

Part of the day's signal

AI is not firing office workers. It is slowing their pay and their hiring.

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

A new study says AI is holding down office workers' pay, not taking away their jobs. [1]

Who is involved

Who is involved

Why it matters

The next test is whether the pay gap still shows up when researchers can measure more than 321 of the roughly 800 US job types. [2]

How it works

A pay rise depends on the other jobs a worker could take

How it works

When firms need fewer new hires, workers have fewer places to go, and raises shrink even though nobody is fired.

How it works · step 1 of 5

A worker mostly gets a raise when another employer might hire them

How it works · step 2 of 5

AI lets each firm get more done with the staff it already has

How it works · step 3 of 5

So firms post fewer new jobs, especially junior ones

How it works · step 4 of 5

With fewer offers around, workers ask for less and firms offer less

How it works · step 5 of 5

Pay grows more slowly, while unemployment stays low

The twist

Nobody has to be fired for AI to hold down pay.

The twist

It is enough that fewer firms are hiring, because a raise is mostly what a firm pays to keep a worker who could leave.

Seen the same day

Wipro kept its staff but needs fewer new ones, and TCS said Indian IT firms will slow hiring, so engineers have fewer firms to move to.

Seen the same day

An IT manager who has sent 600 applications since January cannot easily refuse a bad interview, because each opening is scarce.

Seen the same day

Workers who fear being replaced pay for the tools and hide their use, instead of asking their employer to pay.

The catch

It only holds if the money firms save is not spent hiring people somewhere else, and one economist says part of the measured loss is exactly that.

The whole

The manager who never posts a job, the graduate who never sees it and the worker who does not ask for a raise are all inside this.

The whole

None of them can see the job that was never advertised.

What's really going on

A study of 321 US occupations says employers are keeping the gains from AI by giving smaller raises and posting fewer jobs, not by firing people. [1][2]

Why it works on people

Unemployment is one familiar number, and at 4.1% it looks healthy, so a raise that never came and a job that was never posted do not show up as harm. [1]

Who gains

Real pay in those jobs grew 6.7 points slower since 2023 while the number of staff stayed the same. [2]

Who pays

Employers are posting fewer new positions, especially for them. [1]

Nobody knows yet

Whether AI is really what is slowing pay.

Only 321 of about 800 US job types could be measured and just 11 counted as highly exposed. One economist says tech's hiring slump after the pandemic explains part of it. [2]

Good news

US unemployment fell to 4.1% in August, and employers added 162,000 jobs.

The short version

That's the story in short.

The whole story has 13 more parts.

or swipe up for the next storyor scroll on for the next story ↓

The whole story, in 13 parts ↓

Part 1 of 13 · Who else is involved

Part 1 of 13 · Who else is involved

Part 2 of 13 · How it unfolded

Part 3 of 13

Sania Edlich, a Princeton researcher, and Torsten Slok, chief economist at the investment firm Apollo, compared 321 US occupations. [1]

Part 4 of 13

Since 2023, pay after inflation grew 6.7 percentage points slower in the jobs most exposed to AI than in the least exposed. [2]

Part 5 of 13

The number of people employed in those jobs did not change.

Part 5 of 13

The authors say firms are keeping AI's gains by holding down raises instead of cutting staff. [1]

Part 6 of 13

Employers are also opening fewer new positions than before, especially for young people. [1]

Part 7 of 13

US unemployment fell to 4.1% in August.

Part 7 of 13

In May 2025, Anthropic's chief executive had warned AI could push it above 10%. [1]

Part 8 of 13

Workers' share of US business income was 52.8% in the second quarter, the lowest since the records began in 1947. [2]

Part 9 of 13

Wipro, one of India's biggest IT outsourcing firms, says AI now does work equal to 20,000 of its 243,000 staff, who were moved to other roles. [3]

Part 10 of 13

Hang Ten, a startup run by former Infosys chief Vishal Sikka, says teams of two to four people now do projects that used to need about 30. [4]

Part 11 of 13

Hiring has been slow for months, and nearly 4 in 10 US job seekers have quit a hiring process over an interview run by AI. [5]

Part 12 of 13

The evidence is thin: only 11 of the 321 occupations met the study's high-exposure bar, and one economist says the sample is too small. [2]

Part 13 of 13

Anthropic's own middle scenario for 2030 has pay for knowledge workers staying roughly flat. [6]

Google's sealed ad order is made public

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

A US federal court on Wednesday made public Judge Leonie Brinkema's 106-page order on Google's advertising technology, the software that sells ad space on websites. [7]

She ruled last year that Google broke the law to protect that business, and this month refused to make it sell part of it. [7]

The order says Google must make its ad tools work with rival products and share auction data with publishers. [7] Google must also appoint an internal monitor to check it obeys. [7]

Why it matters

News sites that sell ads through Google get auction data they could not see before. [7] Google keeps its ad exchange and every other ad tool it owns. [7]

Why it matters

US courts have now twice found Google a monopoly, in search and in ads, and twice declined to break it up. [7]

Who gains

It keeps its whole advertising business; the order asks it to work with rivals, share auction data and appoint a monitor. [7]

Nobody knows yet

What Google's monitor can see and do.

We have read a report of the 106-page order, not the order itself, and the report does not say what powers the monitor has or when publishers get the data. [7]

Good news

Websites that sell ads through Google will get data on its ad auctions, under a court order made public on Wednesday.

Oracle cuts jobs after a record quarter

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Oracle, the American business-software company that now rents out AI data centres, began another round of layoffs on Monday. [8]

Staff were emailed that their role was gone and that Monday was their last working day. [9]

Its workforce had already shrunk 13%, from about 162,000 to 141,000, in the year to 31 May. [8]

Days earlier it reported quarterly revenue of $19.3bn, up about 30%, and added $700m to its budget for job cuts. [9]

Why it matters

The money is going into data centres: Oracle spent $28.5bn on buildings and equipment in one quarter, against $8.5bn a year earlier. [8]

Why it matters

About two-thirds of its staff work outside the US, and EU law requires talks with staff and a 30-day wait before large layoffs. [8]

Who gains

Analysts at TD Cowen put the yearly payroll savings from the cuts at $8bn to $10bn, which helps pay for data centres. [8]

Who pays

They were told by email that the same day was their last working day. [9]

Nobody knows yet

How many Oracle staff lost their jobs on Monday, and in which countries.

Oracle has not said, and it is not known whether European staff got the same same-day email that EU law does not allow. [8]

Reach cuts 220 newsroom jobs

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Reach, the British publisher of the Daily Mirror, the Daily Express and many local papers, is cutting 220 editorial jobs and closing three local news websites. [10]

Its chief content officer, David Higgerson, told staff that visits from Google had fallen 46% in a year. [10]

Reach blames Google answering more searches with AI-written summaries, so fewer people click through to news sites. [10]

About 60 new jobs in subscriptions and video make the net loss nearly 160. [10]

Why it matters

Britain's competition regulator ruled in June that Google must let publishers opt out of AI summaries without losing search ranking. [10] Those controls can take up to nine months to arrive. [10]

Why it matters

KentLive, AberdeenLive and GalwayBeo close in the meantime. [10]

What's really going on

The same week, Oracle laid off staff days after its revenue rose about 30%, and Reach cut 220 journalists after losing Google traffic to AI summaries. [9][10]

Who pays

220 editorial jobs go and three local news sites close after Google traffic fell 46%. [10]

Nvidia's boss rejects a legal pass to slow AI

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Dario Amodei, head of the AI lab Anthropic, proposed on Saturday that leading labs agree to slow their most advanced models, possibly with a waiver from competition law. [11]

US competition law normally bans rival firms from agreeing to limit what they make. [11]

Jensen Huang, head of Nvidia, whose chips most AI runs on, called new laws for this 'completely unnecessary'. [11]

David Sacks, who chairs the US president's science advisers, told the labs to slow down without asking for a waiver. [12]

Why it matters

OpenAI told reporters it has talked with Anthropic and Google about safety for weeks and does not think a waiver is needed. [13]

Why it matters

Nvidia sells chips to both Anthropic and OpenAI, so a slower race could slow its own growth. [11]

Nobody knows yet

Whether any AI lab will actually slow down.

OpenAI says it has talked with Anthropic and Google for weeks but has published nothing. Meta and Nvidia say no new rules are needed, and Congress is away until after 3 November. [13][14][11][16]

Zuckerberg says each lab can keep itself safe

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Mark Zuckerberg, head of Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, wrote on Tuesday that every AI lab already has reason to build safely. [14]

He said labs would face large legal claims if their models caused harm. [14] He pointed to Meta delaying its Muse AI agent from April to 8 September for safety work. [15]

He gave no sign Meta would join the slowdown Amodei proposed. [15]

Why it matters

Meta's own tests found Muse pulling up personal photos it had not been asked for. [15]

Why it matters

OpenAI's Sam Altman and xAI's Elon Musk backed Amodei's call, so the biggest US labs are now split. [14]

Left and right rally against fast AI

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Senator Bernie Sanders, Representative Chip Roy and Steve Bannon, Trump's former strategist, spoke on Tuesday at a 'Pro-Human Assembly' in Washington. [16]

The Future of Life Institute, a charity that campaigns on technology risks, organised it. [16] Sanders and Representative Greg Casar have introduced a bill to pause advanced AI development. [16]

House Speaker Mike Johnson said the same day there can be no pause, because the US would lose its lead to China. [16]

Why it matters

The House leaves Washington on Thursday and does not return until after the 3 November election, so no AI law is likely before then. [16]

Why it matters

President Trump has called the safety worries a hoax. [16]

Free-to-download AI trails the best by four months

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

A report from Mozilla, published on 15 September, says open-weight AI models, which anyone can download and run, are about 4.4 months behind the best paid models. [17]

Moonshot AI's Kimi K3 costs about 30% as much as Anthropic's best model, and scored three points lower on one combined test. [17]

On a neutral test setup, Z.ai's GLM 5.2 cost a fifth as much per task as Anthropic's Claude Opus models and scored within a point of them. [17]

Why it matters

Eight of the ten most-used models on OpenRouter, a marketplace for AI models, had open weights in August, and most of the best open models are Chinese. [17]

Why it matters

Mozilla's technology chief says paid models earn their price mainly on tasks taking eight to twelve hours. [17]

Who gains

DoorDash runs routine work on Kimi, an open model, and pays for Anthropic's model only on harder tasks. [17]

Nobody knows yet

How far the four-month gap between free and paid AI models depends on the test.

Paid models come with their own software for using tools, which can raise scores, and the only revenue split cited is from 2025. [17]

Good news

AI models that anyone can download and run for free now come within about four months of the best paid models, at a fraction of the cost.

Insuring big tech's debt costs more

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Apollo Global Management, a large US investment firm, said on Wednesday that insurance against default on big cloud companies' bonds is getting pricier. [18]

The extra cost over the same insurance on bank bonds has grown to about 0.6 percentage points, from roughly zero in October 2025. [18]

Apollo's chief economist Torsten Slok blamed borrowing for AI buildings, rising debt and negative cash flow. [18]

Alphabet, Amazon and Meta are each expected to spend $25bn to $30bn more than they bring in. [18]

Why it matters

JPMorgan still told clients to buy Meta shares, while forecasting it could spend $65bn to $75bn a year more than it earns in 2027 and 2028. [19]

Why it matters

Microsoft is the exception among the four, with positive cash flow of $33.4bn. [18]

Part of a signal

Investors paying for things nobody has judged yet

Also seen in Gaming and Finance.

The whole signal →

California votes on its internet rules

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

California's utility regulator, the CPUC, was set to vote on Thursday on the state's plan for $1.86bn of federal broadband money. [20]

The Trump administration requires states taking that money to stop enforcing net neutrality, rules that bar internet providers from blocking or slowing lawful traffic. [20]

The exemption would cover the whole state for up to 14 years. [20] California and Illinois are the only states that have not finalised their plans. [20]

Why it matters

About 69% of California's share goes to five big providers, including Comcast, AT&T and SpaceX's Starlink. [20]

Why it matters

Nearly 30 groups warn the deal could also put at risk a $20-a-month Verizon plan for low-income homes. [20]

Who gains

Taking federal broadband money would free them from state net neutrality and price rules across the whole state for up to 14 years. [20]

Who pays

Advocates say the broadband deal could put at risk a $20-a-month Verizon plan meant for them. [20]

Nobody knows yet

Whether California will give up its net neutrality law.

The regulator calls Thursday's vote a formality, while nearly 30 groups call it the beginning of the end; no lawsuit has been filed. [20]

US plans airwave sales worth over $100bn

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Brendan Carr, chair of the Federal Communications Commission, the US telecom regulator, said on Wednesday that coming sales of radio airwaves could raise more than $100bn. [21]

The first, in 2027, sells 160 megahertz in the Upper C-Band, frequencies used for mobile data. [21] Three more auctions are planned, to finish by the end of 2028. [21]

Carr said buyers now reach beyond AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile, which carry nearly all US mobile service. [21]

Why it matters

SpaceX bought $17bn of airwave licences from EchoStar last year to sell phone and data service from its Starlink satellites. [22]

Why it matters

Starlink had 9 million subscribers last year, small next to carriers with about $350bn of yearly revenue but growing much faster. [22]

Spain logs its first breach by an AI agent

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Spain's data protection agency, the AEPD, said on Monday it had its first report of a data breach allegedly carried out by an AI agent, software that acts on its own. [23]

Using a widely known AI model, the agent logged into a system, searched it for weaknesses, changed personal data and viewed invoices. [23]

The agency named neither the model nor the organisation attacked. [23] It said the model's maker was not necessarily compromised. [23]

Why it matters

The agency said AI does not invent new attacks but makes old ones faster, leaving less time to catch them. [23] It gave no date for finishing its review. [23]

Nobody knows yet

Which AI model the agent in Spain used, and whom it attacked.

The AEPD named neither and gave no date for finishing its review. [23]

EU child online-safety law due Thursday

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

The European Commission, which proposes EU laws, was set to present its EU Kids Act on Thursday, with the social media age limit still undecided. [24]

Its expert panel recommended 13, while France supports 15. [24] The plan targets features that keep children scrolling, not only what they see. [24]

Researchers got past the EU's proposed age-check app in under two minutes. [24]

Why it matters

Countries are moving on their own: France bans social media under 15, and Norway is writing an under-16 ban with fines up to 20 million kroner. [24]

Why it matters

Any age limit means platforms must first work out who is a child, which means collecting data about users. [24]

Nobody knows yet

What age limit the EU Kids Act sets, and how it will be enforced.

The text was not published before Thursday, the choice was still between 13 and 15, and no penalties had been proposed. [24]

Florida sues Netflix over children's data

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Florida's attorney general, James Uthmeier, sued Netflix on 9 September. He says it collected detailed data on subscribers and their children and used it to sell advertising. [25]

The 66-page complaint quotes former chief executive Reed Hastings telling analysts in 2020 that Netflix did not collect anything. [25]

The state says Netflix records billions of actions, such as what users pause, replay or skip. [25] Netflix says the case lacks merit. [25]

Why it matters

Netflix launched a cheaper plan with ads in November 2022, and Florida says it now lets data brokers such as Experian match their data with its own. [25]

Why it matters

The suit also targets autoplay being switched on by default for children's profiles. [25]

Bending Spoons buys Miro for $1.36bn

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Bending Spoons, a Milan company that buys apps and runs them, agreed on 10 September to buy Miro, the online whiteboard, in a cash deal valued at $1.355bn. [26]

Miro has about $600m a year in recurring revenue and over 100 million users, nearly 4 million of them paying. [26]

It is Bending Spoons' second big software purchase in weeks, after Airtable, a $1.285bn deal that closed last week. [26] The Miro deal should close by the end of 2026. [26]

Why it matters

Bending Spoons already owns Evernote, Vimeo and WeTransfer, and it says it usually reorganises the teams and changes how the products make money. [26]

Why it matters

It raised $1.68bn when it listed on Nasdaq in July, so it has money to keep buying. [26]

UK workers pay for AI themselves

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Deloitte, one of the big four accounting firms, surveyed 25,000 UK workers. [27] Of those using AI tools, 17% pay for at least one out of their own pocket. [28]

That adds up to about 958 million pounds a year. [28] Almost a third use AI without their employer knowing, and half have had no formal training. [28]

Users said the tools save them about 70 minutes a week. [27]

Why it matters

Among weekly users, 64% worry their manager thinks AI could replace them. [28]

Why it matters

In the US, the typical employer spends about $11 a worker a month on AI, according to data from the payments company Ramp. [28]

How it works

Workers who fear being replaced pay for the tools and hide their use, instead of asking their employer to pay.

The idea, in story 1: A pay rise depends on the other jobs a worker could take →

Who pays

They spend about 958 million pounds a year of their own money on AI tools for work. [28]

Wayve hires Waymo's former finance chief

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Wayve, a self-driving startup valued at about $8.5bn, hired Elisa de Martel as chief financial officer. [29]

She held the same job from 2022 to January 2026 at Waymo, Alphabet's robotaxi company, as it raised $5.6bn. [29]

Wayve's software learns to drive from data instead of detailed maps, and it has deals with Nissan and Stellantis. [29]

It runs public rides in London with a safety driver on board, and Tokyo is expected next. [29]

Why it matters

Wayve has raised $3.2bn and now has to turn trials into paying customers. [29] Uber also wants to use its software for robotaxis. [29]

AI agents can now set up a company's WhatsApp

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Meta released a tool on 15 September that lets AI coding agents such as Claude, Cursor or ChatGPT set up a company's WhatsApp Business account. [30]

It uses MCP, a shared standard that connects AI agents to other companies' software. [30] The agent can create the account, verify the phone number and write message templates. [30]

Before, developers moved by hand between several Meta websites and tools. [30]

Why it matters

PayPal, Stripe, GitHub, Slack and Salesforce already offer similar connections for agents. [30] It is a small example of setup work shifting from a developer to an AI agent. [30]

Y Combinator's newest startups lean to hardware

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Y Combinator, the Silicon Valley program that funds very young startups, held its Demo Day on 10 September. [31]

Investors told TechCrunch this batch leaned far more to hard science and hardware than before. [31]

Their picks included Atomarine, which plans nuclear-powered data centres on barges, and Nori, a $1,600 home robot that folds clothes. [31] Atomarine says it has letters of intent worth over $4bn. [31]

Why it matters

Several picks aim at AI's power problem, including Parasma, which is trying to compute with human brain cells. [31]

Why it matters

Investors said prices for stakes in the batch were far more sensible than in recent rounds. [31]

That's the whole Tech day.

19 stories, 31 sources.