Day Lila
Day Lila

Sunday, 1 November 2026

1 Nov · Tech · In brief

Tech · Sunday, 1 November 2026

Tech, in brief

14 stories · 22 sources

Swipe up for the day in brief ↑Scroll down for the day in brief ↓

What is moving · 1 of 4

Investors asking AI to pay

Building ↑

OpenAI has secured about $11 billion of the $20 billion it now wants, The Wall Street Journal reported. [2] S&P, which grades how safe a company's debt is, cut its outlook on Meta over its AI spending. [5] Hilton, the hotel chain, called its bookings from AI agents insignificant. [17]

What is moving · 2 of 4

Limits on what AI may do

Building ↑

Pope Leo XIV asked states to move toward banning weapons that kill without a person deciding. [7] OpenAI said ChatGPT will stop giving teenagers practical information about weapons. [12] Developers say Anthropic's Claude now refuses to rebuild existing games. [22]

What is moving · 3 of 4

AI agents still need people

Steady →

Dazzle AI, an AI helper start-up, hands tasks its agent fumbles to human contractors. [10] A vet had to approve every step of an AI-run mouse surgery that could not be undone. [9]

What is moving · 4 of 4

Fights over who pays for AI's growth

Building ↑

France's lower house voted to tax firms about 6 US cents for each gigabyte they send. [1] Almost $200 billion of US data-centre projects were held up by local opposition in the first half of 2026. [20] Memory bought for AI data centres has pushed up the price of phones and PCs, Engadget says. [15]

France's lower house votes 11-10 to tax internet traffic from Google, Netflix and Meta at about 6 US cents a gigabyte

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

The Assembly vote on 30 October

France's National Assembly voted 11 to 10 for a tax on internet traffic on 30 October. [1]

Firms that send data to French users would pay €0.055, about 6 US cents, per gigabyte. [1]

The vote adds the tax to next year's budget bill, but more votes are to come. [1]

Who is involved

Why it matters

If it passes, the biggest bills land on the few firms sending most of the data. [1]

How it works

Economists call it a per-unit tax: the bill grows with gigabytes sent, not with profit. [1]

The truth

France's budget would gain about €10 billion a year, if the author's estimate holds. [1]

The truth

Nobody yet knows whether users would end up paying: the two sides disagree. [1]

What comes next

The amendment must still survive further votes in France's parliament before it becomes law. [1]

What's really going on

France's lower house voted 11 to 10 to tax Google, Netflix, Meta and others for the data they send to French users, though France's government opposes it and more votes remain. [1]

Why it works on people

A big round number, like €10 billion a year, makes a first vote by a single seat sound like a law already passed.

Who pays

Would be billed €0.055 for each gigabyte sent to French users, up to 15% of their French sales. [1]

Nobody knows yet

Whether France's traffic tax survives the rest of the budget process.

The vote was 11 to 10, France's government opposes it, and further parliamentary votes are still to come. [1]

Nobody knows yet

Whether the cost would reach users.

The finance committee's lead member says firms would pass it on; its author says free apps cannot. [1]

Nobody knows yet

How the traffic would be counted without watching users closely.

Minister David Amiel doubted it can be traced to each firm without complicated monitoring. [1]

The short version

That's the story in short.

The whole story has 5 more parts.

or swipe up for the next storyor scroll on for the next story ↓

The whole story, in 5 parts ↓

Part 1 of 5

Laurent Lhardit, a Socialist member of France's parliament, wrote the change. [1]

Part 1 of 5

His notes name Google, Meta, Netflix, Amazon and Akamai as likely payers. [1]

Part 1 of 5

Akamai: copies kept near users

Akamai runs networks that keep copies of websites close to users, so pages load faster. [1]

Part 1 of 5

France's government opposed the change, and so did the finance committee's lead member. [1]

Part 2 of 5

French internet providers such as Orange would measure how much data each company sends. [1]

Part 2 of 5

every three months

They would report the totals to France's tax office every three months. [1]

Part 2 of 5

Arcep, France's telecoms regulator, would oversee the counting. [1]

Part 3 of 5

Lhardit estimates the tax would raise about €10 billion a year. [1]

Part 3 of 5

About 200 billion gigabytes reach French users through their providers each year. [1]

Part 3 of 5

Five big companies named in the amendment send about half of that traffic. [1]

Part 3 of 5

Each company's bill is capped at 15% of its French sales or 2% of worldwide sales. [1]

Part 4 of 5

The finance committee's lead member argued that firms would pass the cost on to users. [1]

Part 4 of 5

Lhardit replied that Facebook, Instagram and TikTok are free to use. [1]

Part 4 of 5

“I fail to see how a tax can be passed on”
Laurent Lhardit

"I fail to see how a tax can be passed on," he said of these apps. [1]

Part 4 of 5

Minister David Amiel doubted that traffic could be traced to each firm without complicated monitoring. [1]

Part 4 of 5

privacy at risk

Opponents also warn that counting traffic this way could put users' privacy at risk. [1]

Part 5 of 5

taxes on digital sales

Several European countries already tax big tech firms on their advertising and marketplace sales. [1]

Part 5 of 5

In July Meta began charging advertisers extra fees in France, Italy and Spain. [1]

Part 5 of 5

Meta said the fees cover such taxes and other government charges. [1]

OpenAI has $11bn of the $20bn it wants

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

OpenAI, which makes ChatGPT, now aims to raise up to $20 billion in its new round. [3]

What OpenAI wants to raise

It first sought $30 billion; the Financial Times reported the $10 billion cut on Friday. [2]

So far it has secured about $11 billion, The Wall Street Journal reported. [4]

“tepid”
The Wall Street Journal

Interest from some large investors was tepid, the Journal said. [4]

How it works

Venture rounds can close in stages: money signed by a deadline, then more later. [2]

Who is involved

Investors from the United Arab Emirates, including the state-backed fund MGX, should be the largest backers. [2]

Who is involved

OpenAI will next ask family offices, which manage one rich family's money, and wealthy individuals. [2]

How it got here

OpenAI's value after the new money

The round values OpenAI at $1.25 trillion, down from the $1.4 trillion it first pitched. [2]

How it got here

AI shares fell all week; Alphabet's dropped about 12% on Thursday, its worst day on record. [5]

Why it matters

OpenAI has told investors it plans about $600 billion of computing spending by 2030. [6]

Why it matters

Anthropic, its main rival, plans to sell its shares to the public next month. [2]

The truth

A later offer will let wealthy individuals buy at the same $1.25 trillion value. [2]

The truth

final size unknown

The round is still open, so the final size could change, CNBC's source said. [3]

What's really going on

Elsewhere, OpenAI has secured only about $11 billion of the $20 billion it now wants, as investors ask whether AI spending will pay back. [2][3]

Nobody knows yet

How much OpenAI's round finally raises.

The round is still open, the first close is expected below $20 billion, and OpenAI did not immediately respond to requests for comment. [3][4]

Part of a signal

Who pays for building AI

Also seen in Finance.

Companies building AI data centres pay high prices for memory chips, and South Korea's chipmakers gain.

The whole signal →

The Pope asks states to ban killer robots

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

“disarmed”
Pope Leo XIV

Pope Leo XIV called on Friday for artificial intelligence to be "disarmed". [7]

talks in Geneva

He urged states meeting in Geneva to take steps toward banning lethal autonomous weapons. [8]

He means weapons that choose targets and use force with no person deciding. [7]

a person decides

Decisions on life, freedom and the use of force must stay under human oversight, he said. [7]

He named two choices never to hand to machines: a target list and a border database. [7]

“Machines are tools, not persons”
Pope Leo XIV

"Machines are tools, not persons," he said, rejecting legal rights for AI systems. [8]

How it got here

In 2024 Pope Francis told the G7 that no machine should ever choose to kill. [7]

What comes next

States meet under a UN weapons treaty in Geneva from 16 to 20 November. [7]

How it works

Arms-control experts call the demand human control: a person answers for each use of force. [8]

Why it matters

standards and oversight

He asked for shared standards and independent oversight, not more statements of principle. [7]

The truth

Not all of the AI industry agrees: Mistral's boss, Arthur Mensch, has rebutted him. [7]

How it works

Why a machine can be handed part of a decision, not all of it

How it works

Human factors engineers split a decision into steps and rank who does each one, from a person deciding everything to a machine acting alone.

How it works · step 1 of 6

A decision has steps: gather facts, list options, choose, act

How it works · step 2 of 6

Each step can be done by a person or by a machine

How it works · step 3 of 6

Engineers rank the split in levels, from a person doing it all to a machine acting alone

How it works · step 4 of 6

In between: the machine suggests, or acts unless stopped, or acts and reports

How it works · step 5 of 6

The higher the level, the less time a person has to catch a wrong move

How it works · step 6 of 6

So designers keep a person at the steps that cannot be undone

The twist

The choice is rarely all human or all machine.

The twist

In the mouse surgery, the AI picked the drug and the spot, and a vet still had to approve each step that could not be undone.

The picture

  1. 1Pope's demand for weapons: a person decides1
  2. 2Mouse surgery: AI acts, a vet approves each step3
  3. 3Dazzle: AI acts, hands hard jobs to people4
  4. 4Anthropic's warning: AI copies itself alone5

A simple five-step version of the levels of automation. The steps are a ranking we made up for this picture, not a measurement.

Seen the same day

The AI agent's mouse surgery

The agent chose the therapy and the brain area, but every step that could not be undone waited for a vet's yes.

Seen the same day

The Pope's call before the Geneva talks

He asks that the choice to use force stay at the lowest level, where a person decides every time.

Seen the same day

People finishing AI agents' jobs

Dazzle's agent acts on its own until it flags a task it cannot do, then a person takes over.

Seen the same day

Anthropic's AI worm warning

Its fear is the top level: a model that copies itself onto devices with no person at any step.

The catch

A person who only approves can stop checking. If the machine is right a hundred times, the hundred-and-first wrong move may get approved too.

The whole

The shopper, the vet, the soldier and the teenager on ChatGPT each sit at a different level, often set by someone they never met.

The whole

Each sees the step in front of them, and few can see who decided the rest.

An AI agent operates on a mouse's brain

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

brain surgery on a mouse

Exin Therapeutics, a biotech start-up, says an AI agent did brain surgery on a mouse. [9]

a mouse with epilepsy

The goal was to reduce seizures in a mouse bred to have epilepsy. [9]

1 of 19

therapy chosen from 19

The agent chose one gene therapy from 19 options listed in a spreadsheet. [9]

It picked the brain area and worked out where to inject from 3 research papers. [9]

Then it drove robot arms that injected 250 nanolitres into the mouse's brain. [9]

A licensed vet had to approve every step that could not be undone. [9]

a stop switch

The vet also held a switch that cut power to every motor. [9]

How it got here

The team used Anthropic's Sonnet model after its newer Opus 5.5 refused the job. [9]

Why it matters

Gabriel Ocana-Santero, the firm's chief executive, says he knows of no agent doing this before. [9]

The truth

the firm's own account

So far the account comes from the company's own thread on X. [9]

Good news

the mouse recovered

The mouse recovered well and was filmed moving around its cage. [9]

How it works

The AI agent's mouse surgery

The agent chose the therapy and the brain area, but every step that could not be undone waited for a vet's yes.

The idea, in story 3: Why a machine can be handed part of a decision, not all of it →

People still finish many AI agents' jobs

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Some AI helper start-ups send the tasks their agents fumble to human workers, CNBC reports. [10]

an AI agent

AI agents are programs that act for a person online, such as booking or buying. [10]

They still struggle with phone calls, doctor's appointments and booking local services. [10]

Who is involved

Marissa Mayer, a former Yahoo boss, runs Dazzle AI, which passes some jobs to contractors. [10]

One Dazzle user's agent mixed up window glass with glass for a tabletop. [10]

handed to a person

Dazzle's system flagged the mix-up and handed the task to a person. [10]

Who is involved

Duckbill, another start-up, sells agent makers a way to hire people for tasks. [10]

“not dissimilar from Uber”
Meghan Joyce

Its boss, Meghan Joyce, says the model is "not dissimilar from Uber": small, simple tasks. [10]

Why it matters

Agents like Meta's Muse and OpenAI's Dots still hit roadblocks that need a person. [10]

The truth

person or program?

When an agent calls a company, the voice on the line may be a hired person. [10]

How it works

People finishing AI agents' jobs

Dazzle's agent acts on its own until it flags a task it cannot do, then a person takes over.

The idea, in story 3: Why a machine can be handed part of a decision, not all of it →

Who gains

Get paid work finishing the tasks agents fumble, sold to agent makers through firms like Duckbill. [10]

Shops say AI agents bring few sales yet

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Executives at about 50 companies told investors and Wired that AI agents bring little business yet. [17]

“We haven't seen anything of significance”
T-Mobile

T-Mobile, a US phone network, said "We haven't seen anything of significance" from agents. [17]

very, very small

eBay, the online marketplace, called agent activity very, very small. [17]

bookings: insignificant

Hilton, the hotel chain, called bookings from agents insignificant. [17]

Who is involved

Amazon's boss, Andy Jassy, said few customers shop through outside agents yet. [16]

He expects Amazon's own helper, Alexa for Shopping, to be the main way people shop there. [16]

Amazon says more than 400 million customers used it in the past year. [16]

How it got here

Muse blocked

Amazon blocked Meta's Muse agent from its site about a month ago. [16]

How it got here

Meta says more than 10 million people in the US and Canada have set up Muse. [16]

Why it matters

Investors had feared agents would weaken shoppers' loyalty to brands and start price wars. [17]

How it works

Marketers call it brand loyalty: shoppers return to a shop they trust out of habit. [17]

The truth

address and card on file

Amazon gains by keeping shoppers in its own helper, which knows their address and payment details. [16]

Sam Altman meets 50 Samsung bosses

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Samsung hosted OpenAI's boss, Sam Altman, for talks with about 50 of its presidents on Saturday. [13]

Yongin, south of Seoul

They met at Samsung's training centre in Yongin, south of Seoul. [13]

Bloomberg says the talks aimed to deepen ties on memory chips as shortages grow. [14]

Who is involved

DRAM, working memory

DRAM, the memory chip Samsung makes, is the fast memory a computer works in. [13]

How it got here

“quite terrible”
Sam Altman

Two days earlier, Altman said it was "quite terrible" for memory to sit in home computers. [13]

How it got here

5 of 100

how often home memory is used, by Altman's figure

He said home computers use that memory about 5% of the time. [13]

40 of 100

of world memory output tied up by OpenAI

Engadget notes OpenAI has tied up about 40% of the world's memory output through deals. [15]

Samsung has worked to supply memory for Stargate, OpenAI's data centre project. [13]

About 2,300 Samsung executives have taken AI training so far. [13]

Why it matters

Memory bought for AI data centres has pushed up prices of phones and PCs, Engadget says. [15]

How it works

Economists call this allocation: deciding who gets a good that is in short supply. [13]

The truth

nothing published

Samsung published nothing Altman said and named none of its executives in the room. [13]

Who gains

Are courted by OpenAI while memory is short, which Altman says will leave each with about $100 billion of free cash a year. [13]

Who pays

Pay more as memory goes to AI data centres, Engadget says, with OpenAI holding about 40% of output through deals. [15]

Nobody knows yet

What, if anything, Samsung and Sam Altman agreed.

Samsung published nothing Altman said and named none of its executives. [13]

ChatGPT tightens limits on weapons talk

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

no weapons help for teens

OpenAI said on Friday ChatGPT will stop giving teenagers practical information about weapons. [12]

The limit holds even when a teen's question looks harmless. [12]

For all users, ChatGPT will give less detail about past mass attacks and their attackers. [12]

no reconstructions

It will not reconstruct an attack, such as which weapons were used. [12]

chat ended

ChatGPT can now end a chat that shows someone fixing on harming another person. [12]

If it ends several such chats, OpenAI may pause the account for a time. [12]

OpenAI says it made more than 200 referrals to police in the third quarter. [12]

How it got here

8 of 8

US states suing OpenAI

Eight US states have sued OpenAI over harm to children. [12]

What comes next

early 2027

Its first Community Safety Report comes out in early 2027. [12]

Why it matters

An age-guessing system decides who gets the teen version, using signals such as behaviour. [12]

How it works

Safety designers call these guardrails: limits that hold whatever reason a user gives. [12]

The truth

prove your age

Adults wrongly placed with teens must prove their age through Persona, an outside checking firm. [12]

Experts weigh Anthropic's AI worm warning

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Frontier Red Team

Anthropic's Frontier Red Team, which tests its AI for dangers, published new research. [11]

It says small AI models may be months away from copying themselves across poorly protected devices. [11]

a botnet

That could create botnets: networks of hijacked devices that are hard to kill. [11]

How it got here

In 2016 the Mirai botnet, built from routers and cameras, knocked big websites offline. [11]

Who is involved

Chris Canal, whose firm EquiStamp checks AI models, said it came earlier than he expected. [11]

Who is involved

Michael Bailey, a Georgia Tech professor who studied Mirai, doubts it was shown convincingly. [11]

a simulated network

He says Anthropic's test ran in a simulated network where breaking in was trivial. [11]

Why it matters

Bailey says AI could cut the human work of adapting an attack to each new device. [11]

How it works

Security researchers call a self-spreading program a worm: it copies itself with nobody clicking. [11]

The truth

warnings as marketing?

AI companies have played up dangers before as a form of marketing, Engadget notes. [11]

How it works

Anthropic's AI worm warning

Its fear is the top level: a model that copies itself onto devices with no person at any step.

The idea, in story 3: Why a machine can be handed part of a decision, not all of it →

Nobody knows yet

Whether AI can really spread itself across devices.

Anthropic says small models may be months away, but a Georgia Tech expert says its test used a simulated network and a trivial break-in. [11]

Claude refuses to copy existing games

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

no copies of existing games

Developers say Anthropic's Claude now refuses to rebuild specific existing video games. [22]

“Don't build a recreation of a specific existing game.”
Rule text shared by users

The rule users shared says: "Don't build a recreation of a specific existing game." [22]

refusals mid-project

Complaints on Claude Code's GitHub page report refusals partway through ordinary game work. [22]

Users also report refusals of reverse-engineering: studying how finished software works inside. [22]

How it got here

clone threats

Some game makers have faced scams threatening to clone their demos into full games. [22]

How it got here

On 6 October Anthropic limited its models' advanced hacking skills to approved security groups. [22]

Why it matters

Game makers who feared clones gain protection, but honest developers lose working time. [22]

The truth

what is blocked

Anthropic has not confirmed the rule, so exactly what is blocked is unclear. [22]

Who pays

Hit refusals partway through projects under a rule Anthropic has not confirmed. [22]

Nobody knows yet

What exactly Claude now refuses to build.

The rule text users shared has not been confirmed by Anthropic. [22]

Apple's boss defends its slower AI path

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

“ship AI for AI's sake”
John Ternus

Apple's chief executive, John Ternus, says Apple does not want to ship AI for AI's sake. [18]

Who is involved

Ternus became Apple's chief executive at the start of September. [18]

How it got here

Siri, Apple's voice helper

Apple has been called behind on AI after it delayed a stronger Siri, its voice helper. [18]

How it got here

launched this summer

That stronger Siri finally launched this summer. [18]

“I really like where we're at”
John Ternus

"I really like where we're at," Ternus told Wired's Steven Levy. [18]

AI you do not notice

He said people should not have to think whether AI or older software did it. [18]

Why it matters

apps made unneeded?

Levy asked whether AI agents could make apps unnecessary; Ternus said making products is deeply human. [18]

Data centres become a US election issue

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

a midterm issue

AI data centres have become an issue in the US midterm elections, TechCrunch reports. [20]

3 November

They could sway some races in the vote on 3 November, it says. [20]

Data Center Watch counted almost $200 billion of projects delayed, stalled or blocked by opposition. [20]

first half of 2026

That was in the first half of 2026 alone. [20]

5 of 5

states weighing new rules

Five states, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Texas, New York and Virginia, weigh stricter data-centre rules. [20]

hundreds planned in Virginia

Hundreds of new data centres are planned in Virginia alone. [20]

“Who here is pro-AI data center?”
A panel host at a Brooklyn election event

In Brooklyn, a crowd booed the question "Who here is pro-AI data center?" [20]

How it works

zoning rules

Zoning rules, which decide what is built where, can hide a site's purpose until too late. [20]

Why it matters

Residents fear deals struck with local officials before anyone can object. [20]

The truth

how many races

Nobody yet knows how many races data centres will actually swing. [20]

Part of a signal

Money and taxes on Tuesday's US ballot

Also seen in World, Money and Food.

Farm groups and others are spending heavily on who sits in Congress, while voters in several states decide taxes themselves.

The whole signal →

Amazon switches off voice control of old Echo inputs

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Amazon has switched off voice commands for the AUX input on several older Echo speakers. [19]

a socket for a cable

The AUX input is a socket for plugging in sound from a phone or CD player. [19]

“Alexa, play from line in”
A command that stopped working

Commands like "Alexa, play from line in" no longer work. [19]

Who is involved

4 of 4

Echo models affected

Four models are hit: the third and fourth Echo, the Echo Plus and the first Studio. [19]

owners told by email

Amazon told The Verge it had told the very small number of people who used it. [19]

the app still works

The cable still works, and the Alexa app can still switch the input. [19]

Why it matters

Speakers bought as early as 2018 lost a feature their owners had used. [19]

The truth

no reason given

Amazon did not say why it removed the commands. [19]

Who pays

Lost voice control of the AUX socket on speakers bought as early as 2018, with no reason given. [19]

Carmakers print more of their own tools

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Ford, Rivian and GM are using 3D printing for factory tools and some car parts. [21]

How it works

Engineers call it additive manufacturing: a printer adds material layer by layer from a design. [21]

Rivian has spent over $5 million on printers, and about $1.7 million a year on materials. [21]

paid back within a year

Its head of 3D printing says the machines usually pay for themselves within a year. [21]

Printing cuts the time to make a part from weeks to days, or even hours. [21]

a parts vending machine

Ford put a vending machine of printed parts beside its F-150 pickup line near Dearborn. [21]

Why it matters

Printing in-house cuts what carmakers pay outside suppliers for tooling, Rivian says. [21]

The truth

“well in the millions”
Jared Beck, Rivian

Rivian puts its savings only "well in the millions", giving no exact figure. [21]

Good news

tools designed by workers

Ford workers have designed some of the printed hand tools themselves. [21]

Good news

Rivian's 3D printers cut the time to make a factory part from weeks to days or hours, and usually pay for themselves within a year.

That's the whole Tech day.

14 stories, 22 sources.