Sunday, 1 November 2026
Sunday, 1 November 2026
- In brief
- 1Florida votes Tuesday on cutting property tax on lived-in homes, a cut that would take $11.8 billion a year from local budgets
- 2California's billionaire tax looks close
- 3California votes on $36 billion for homes
- 4North Dakota votes on free school meals
- 5Baltimore votes on a $1,000 baby fund
- 6Inglewood votes on taxing more stadium tickets
- 7US fuel heads for its dearest election day
- 8US workers' share of income hits a record low
- 9Fewer small 401(k) pots are cashed out
- 10SpaceX's president gives shares to poorer children
- 11Japan moves to cut its tax on food
- 12Pakistan's cooking gas rises again
- 13Volunteers pack Diwali food hampers
1 Nov · Money · In brief
Money · Sunday, 1 November 2026
Money, in brief
13 stories · 27 sources
Swipe up for the day in brief ↑Scroll down for the day in brief ↓
What is moving · 1 of 4
Fuel prices
US petrol averaged $4.20 a gallon on Friday, nearly 40% more than a year ago.
What is moving · 2 of 4
Voters cutting their own taxes
Florida's Amendment 3 would cut local property tax by $11.8 billion a year.
What is moving · 3 of 4
Taxing the very rich
California votes on a one-time 5% tax on about 200 billionaires.
What is moving · 4 of 4
Pay falling behind profits
US workers got 52.8% of national income in the spring, the lowest share since 1947.
Part of the day's signals
2 pressures seen across the day run through Money too.
8 sources
Money, in brief
- 2Florida's proposed property tax amendment will require trade-offs - and some residents could end up with higher costs
- 3Billionaire tax and trans rights: what are key state ballot initiatives in midterms?
- 8It's not just California's billionaire tax. Wealth is on the ballot in the midterm elections.
- 16Trump promised to slash energy costs - but gasoline, diesel and jet fuel all soared instead
- 18U.S workers just took home their smallest share of capital since at least 1947 - and the lowest ever recorded
- 22Japan core inflation in September surges to its highest this year at 2.1%
- 26LPG price twice the official rate in open market
- 27Diwali hampers to bring hope to families in need
Florida votes Tuesday on cutting property tax on lived-in homes, a cut that would take $11.8 billion a year from local budgets
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
Florida votes on Tuesday on Amendment 3, a cut in property tax on lived-in homes.
Property tax is a yearly local tax based on what a home is worth.
The tax-free part of a home's value would rise from $50,000 to $250,000 by 2028.
2027
$150,000 tax-free
2028
$250,000 tax-free
It would reach $150,000 first, in 2027.
Florida's legislature estimates local governments would lose $11.8 billion a year.
- 1Needed to pass60%
It needs 60% of voters to say yes, because it changes Florida's constitution.
Who is involved
Florida Realtors
the trade group for Florida's property agents; it put $19.5 million into the Yes campaign
Who is involved
Mike Weinstein
Jacksonville's chief administrative officer, a Republican; he says the cut would hit the city's services
Why it matters
For Florida's home owners, the vote decides a yearly bill averaging just over $3,000.
Why it matters
Libraries
Buses
After-school programs
Local leaders say libraries, buses and after-school programs could be cut if it passes.
How it works
Public finance research finds cutting one group's property tax shifts the tax onto others.
The truth
“won't see any benefit”
Jacksonville's chief administrator says renters and business owners "won't see any benefit".
The truth
The amendment sets out no extra state money to fill the gap, an economist notes.
What comes next
Floridians vote on 3 November, and the result comes after the polls close.
What's really going on
Florida's Amendment 3 would cut the yearly tax on homes their owners live in by about $1,000 on average, and take about $11.8 billion a year from local governments.
What's really going on
Renters, businesses and people who move to Florida later get no exemption, and an economist says businesses and landlords would almost certainly pay more to fill the gap.
Why it works on people
The Yes campaign sells the cut as relief from rising prices, so the vote feels like a vote on the cost of living rather than on what the city stops paying for.
Who gains
Florida owners who already live in their homes
Their tax-free part of the home's value would rise to $250,000 by 2028, while newcomers wait five years for the full break.
Who pays
Florida renters, businesses and city services
Rentals and businesses get no exemption, and city budgets could shrink by as much as 23% next year.
Nobody knows yet
How Florida's cities would fill the gap if Amendment 3 passes.
The amendment names no new state money, and cities could raise other fees, cut services or tax rentals and businesses more.
Nobody knows yet
How tightly North Carolina's property tax limit would bind.
The amendment leaves the figure to lawmakers, and a state scholar says the formula will decide whether it is a guardrail or a hard limit.
Part of a signal
Money and taxes on Tuesday's US ballot
Seen in 4 of the 12 beats
Also seen in World, Food and Tech.
Farm groups and others are spending heavily on who sits in Congress, while voters in several states decide taxes themselves.
The whole signal →The short version
That's the story in short.
The whole story has 8 more parts.
or swipe up for the next storyor scroll on for the next story ↓
The whole story, in 8 parts ↓
Part 1 of 8 · Who else is involved
Josh Stein
North Carolina's Democratic governor; he calls the tax-limit amendments 'con jobs'
Part 2 of 8
The average home owner's bill would fall by about $1,000 a year, the Guardian reports.
Part 2 of 8
Florida's average home is worth about $378,000.
Part 2 of 8
Its owner pays just over $3,000 a year in property tax.
Part 2 of 8
Only the home its owner lives in qualifies, through what Florida calls the homestead exemption.
Part 2 of 8
Before 2027
full break
After 2026
smaller break for 5 years
People who move to Florida after 2026 would get a smaller break for five years.
Part 3 of 8
Rented homes
Shops
Second homes
Rented homes, shops and second homes get no exemption.
Part 3 of 8
But the yearly rise in their taxed value would be capped at 5%, down from 10%.
Part 3 of 8
A Florida economist says businesses and landlords would almost certainly pay more.
Part 3 of 8
City budgets could shrink by as much as 23% next year.
Part 3 of 8
Jacksonville alone could lose up to $372 million over five years, the Florida Policy Institute found.
Part 4 of 8
Ron DeSantis
Florida's governor
Florida's governor, Ron DeSantis, pushed the plan.
Part 4 of 8
Florida Realtors, the trade group for property agents, has put $19.5 million into the Yes campaign.
Part 4 of 8
In a July poll, support fell from 61% to 45% once voters learned the budget hit.
Part 5 of 8
Florida's local property tax take nearly doubled from $32 billion in 2019 to almost $60 billion.
Part 5 of 8
11 US states have already reined in property taxes in 2026, one think tank counts.
Part 6 of 8
6 of 6
six states vote on property tax
Florida is one of six states voting on changes to property tax.
Part 6 of 8
Wyoming would make 50% of a lived-in home's value tax-free, however much it is worth.
Part 6 of 8
Oklahoma would let a home's taxed value rise 1.75% a year at most, down from 3%.
Part 6 of 8
Tennessee has no state property tax, and would ban one in its constitution.
Part 6 of 8
North Carolina would order lawmakers to limit property tax rises, without naming a figure.
Part 6 of 8
A budget group says that saves about $84 per home a year.
Part 6 of 8
It says a 2% limit could cost $950 million in public money.
Part 6 of 8
“con jobs”
North Carolina's governor, Josh Stein, a Democrat, calls the limits 'con jobs'.
Part 7 of 8
North Carolina also votes on cutting its highest allowed income tax rate from 7% to 3.5%.
Part 7 of 8
Washington state votes on repealing its 9.9% tax on household income above $1 million.
Part 7 of 8
Colorado votes on higher income tax for people earning more than $500,000 a year.
Part 7 of 8
Arizona votes on capping local taxes on groceries at 2%.
Part 7 of 8
In all, voters in 39 states answer 145 statewide questions on Tuesday.
Part 7 of 8
Taxes and state money are the biggest group of them.
Part 8 of 8
Over the long run, about 41% of state ballot questions pass, a researcher says.
9 sources
Florida votes Tuesday on cutting property tax on lived-in homes, a cut that would take $11.8 billion a year from local budgets
- 1Florida voters will decide whether to cut taxes for homeowners and slash public services
- 2Florida's proposed property tax amendment will require trade-offs - and some residents could end up with higher costs
- 3Billionaire tax and trans rights: what are key state ballot initiatives in midterms?
- 4State ballots let voters decide on wide-ranging issues
- 5Homeowner's Guide to Midterm Election Ballot Measures
- 6North Carolina To Vote on Ballot Measure Capping Property Taxes
- 7Voters seize the 'say' in key state battles for housing affordability
- 8It's not just California's billionaire tax. Wealth is on the ballot in the midterm elections.
- 910 Places Money Is on the Ballot in the 2026 Midterms
The full story
Florida votes Tuesday on cutting property tax on lived-in homes, a cut that would take $11.8 billion a year from local budgets
Florida votes on Tuesday on Amendment 3, a cut in property tax on lived-in homes.
The average home owner's bill would fall by about $1,000 a year, the Guardian reports.
Rented homes, shops and second homes get no exemption.
Florida's governor, Ron DeSantis, pushed the plan.
Florida's local property tax take nearly doubled from $32 billion in 2019 to almost $60 billion.
Florida is one of six states voting on changes to property tax.
North Carolina also votes on cutting its highest allowed income tax rate from 7% to 3.5%.
Over the long run, about 41% of state ballot questions pass, a researcher says.
Why it matters. For Florida's home owners, the vote decides a yearly bill averaging just over $3,000.
California's billionaire tax looks close
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
California votes on Tuesday on Proposition 40, a one-time 5% tax on billionaires' wealth.
Shares
Private companies
Start-up stakes
Wealth here means everything a person owns, including shares in their companies.
About 200 of California's 21 million tax returns would pay it.
- Healthcare90%
- Schools and food aid10%
Backers say it would raise $100 billion: 90% for healthcare, 10% for schools and food aid.
A new Politico poll finds 45% for it, 43% against and 12% undecided.
Planned Parenthood
California Teachers Association
California Medical Association
Planned Parenthood and the state's teachers' and doctors' groups oppose it.
The truth
The main group fighting it, Building a Better California, has raised $330 million.
How it got here
1978
property tax capped at 1%
Now
a tax on billionaires' wealth
In 1978 Californians voted to cap property tax at 1% of a home's value.
How it got here
Since then, its top 1% of earners have brought in up to half of state revenue.
Why it matters
If it passes, Californians' health cover would get most of the money.
How it works
Economists Owen Zidar and Eric Zwick say California cannot fund itself from a few hundred people.
The truth
1 of 4
about a quarter of the money, gone with six billionaires
Six billionaires who would owe about a quarter of it have left, two economists say.
The truth
Even if it passes, both sides expect long court fights over whether it is legal.
What comes next
Rival Propositions 41 and 42 would cancel it if they win more yes votes.
How it works
Why voters back taxes that land on someone else
How it works
Public choice economists use the median voter theorem: a yes-or-no vote goes the way the voter in the middle wants, and that voter gains when others pay.
How it works · step 1 of 5
A ballot question passes when more than half vote yes
How it works · step 2 of 5
So the deciding vote is the voter in the middle
How it works · step 3 of 5
That voter compares what they gain with what they pay
How it works · step 4 of 5
A cut for many, or a tax on a few, wins that voter
How it works · step 5 of 5
So costs drift to people who are few, or who cannot vote there
The twist
A vote counts people, not dollars.
The twist
Most voters pay nothing for a tax on 200 billionaires or on fans at a stadium, and they gain directly from a cut in their own home tax.
The picture
Proposition 40 would be decided by millions of voters and paid by about 200 of them.
Seen the same day
About 200 of 21 million tax returns would pay it, so almost every voter decides on a tax they will never pay.
Seen the same day
The city's voters decide a tax that every fan at every game pays, whether they live there or not.
Seen the same day
Every voter buys food, so every major party in February's election promised to cut the food tax.
The catch
People do not vote only with their wallets: the billionaire tax polls close to a tie.
The catch
And Florida needs 60%, so its deciding voter is not the one in the middle.
The whole
On Tuesday a Florida home owner votes on a tax cut that Florida's renters and shop owners may help pay for.
The whole
Anyone who rents, moves to a new town or buys a ticket in another city is on the paying side of someone else's vote.
Nobody knows yet
Whether California's billionaire tax passes.
Politico finds 45% for and 43% against, AIMSA finds 50% for and 44% against, and betting markets give it about a one-in-four chance.
Nobody knows yet
How much the billionaire tax would really raise.
Backers say $100 billion; researchers at the Hoover Institution say about $30 billion once billionaires move and court cases are counted.
Nobody knows yet
How much is being spent against the billionaire tax.
The Information puts the main opposing group at $330 million, while the Guardian counts more than $356 million across several groups; the totals cover different committees.
6 sources
California's billionaire tax looks close
- 3Billionaire tax and trans rights: what are key state ballot initiatives in midterms?
- 10If California undid its 'original sin' and matched Texas on taxing property, it would raise more revenue than the billionaire tax, economists say
- 11The Billionaire Tax Might Fail-For Now
- 12Tax the Top, Fix Housing, Back Becerra: Cost of Living Drives California's Vote, AIMSA Poll Finds
- 13Billionaire tax: how a union leader's 'crazy' idea became the defining issue of California's midterms
- 14California billionaire tax explained: What to know about Prop 40
The full story
California's billionaire tax looks close
California votes on Tuesday on Proposition 40, a one-time 5% tax on billionaires' wealth.
Why it matters. If it passes, Californians' health cover would get most of the money.
California votes on $36 billion for homes
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
California also votes on Tuesday on two ways of borrowing money for housing.
Proposition 37 would set up a $25 billion fund of home loans for middle-income buyers.
Buyers would put down at least 3% on a new home costing under $1.5 million.
The state would raise the money by selling bonds, which are loans from investors.
Proposition 1 would let California borrow $11.25 billion for affordable and rental homes.
An AIMSA poll of 2,000 likely voters found 59% back Proposition 37.
The same poll found 54% back Proposition 1.
Who is involved
California Association of Realtors
biggest funder
The California Association of Realtors is Proposition 37's biggest funder.
Why it matters
Rhode Island votes on a $120 million housing bond that would cost $192.5 million with interest.
How it works
Borrowed money is repaid with interest, so a bond costs more than its face value.
The truth
The Hoover Institution warns of pressure for a state bail-out if buyers do not repay.
The full story
California votes on $36 billion for homes
California also votes on Tuesday on two ways of borrowing money for housing.
Why it matters. Rhode Island votes on a $120 million housing bond that would cost $192.5 million with interest.
North Dakota votes on free school meals
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
North Dakota votes on Tuesday on free breakfast and lunch for every public school pupil.
The change would go into the state's constitution, its highest law.
How it got here
Today, whether a child eats free depends on the household's income.
The state would pay for the extra meals, on top of federal money.
Only 8 US states give every pupil free school meals now.
Who is involved
Together for School Meals
citizen-led anti-hunger group
Together for School Meals, a citizen-led anti-hunger group, put it on the ballot.
Why it matters
MultiState, an elections tracker, says no strongly Republican state has done this by vote.
Why it matters
Families above the income line would stop paying for school meals.
1 source
North Dakota votes on free school meals
The full story
North Dakota votes on free school meals
North Dakota votes on Tuesday on free breakfast and lunch for every public school pupil.
Why it matters. MultiState, an elections tracker, says no strongly Republican state has done this by vote.
Baltimore votes on a $1,000 baby fund
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
Baltimore votes on Tuesday on setting up a fund for families with newborn babies.
The city would pay in 3 cents for every $100 of property value it taxes.
Backers plan $1,000 for the parents of each newborn, about 7,100 babies a year.
Why it matters
That would cost the city about $15 million a year.
Who is involved
Brandon Scott
Baltimore's mayor
Baltimore's mayor, Brandon Scott, supports it.
How it got here
The US government already puts $1,000 into Trump Accounts for babies born from 2025.
The truth
The ballot wording only says the money will help families with newborns, to avoid court challenges.
The full story
Baltimore votes on a $1,000 baby fund
Baltimore votes on Tuesday on setting up a fund for families with newborn babies.
Why it matters. That would cost the city about $15 million a year.
Inglewood votes on taxing more stadium tickets
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
Inglewood, the Los Angeles suburb with SoFi Stadium, votes on raising its ticket tax.
Fans pay a 10% ticket tax, but the city stops once it collects a set sum.
How it got here
That cap was set at $15 million in 2015, and it rises with prices.
The measure would lift the cap, bringing in tens of millions of dollars more.
It would also add a 2.5% ticket tax at the nearby Intuit Dome, the Clippers' arena.
Why it matters
SoFi Stadium hosts the Super Bowl in February.
The truth
Inglewood's voters decide a tax that every fan at every game and concert pays.
How it works
The city's voters decide a tax that every fan at every game pays, whether they live there or not.
The idea, in story 2: Why voters back taxes that land on someone else →1 source
Inglewood votes on taxing more stadium tickets
The full story
Inglewood votes on taxing more stadium tickets
Inglewood, the Los Angeles suburb with SoFi Stadium, votes on raising its ticket tax.
Why it matters. SoFi Stadium hosts the Super Bowl in February.
US fuel heads for its dearest election day
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
US petrol averaged $4.20 a gallon on Friday, nearly 40% more than a year ago.
Diesel, used by lorries and farms, rose about 70% in a year to $6.32 a gallon.
GasBuddy, which tracks fuel prices, says Tuesday will be the dearest election day ever for fuel.
In 2022's elections, petrol was $3.80 a gallon.
Since 1 March, Americans have spent about $145 billion more on fuel than a year before.
How it got here
28 Feb
US and Israel attack Iran
Then
Iran strikes tankers
Prices jumped after the US and Israel attacked Iran on 28 February.
How it got here
Iran then hit tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, a key route for oil ships.
Who is involved
Donald Trump
US president
Trump let lorries use tax-free off-road diesel and offered farmers $8 billion.
Why it matters
ExxonMobil's chief says diesel is the key pressure point because the economy runs on it.
How it works
Firms pass fuel costs on: airlines have raised fares to cover dearer jet fuel.
The truth
US energy companies' earnings have more than doubled from a year ago.
The truth
Lower-income families often own no shares, a KPMG economist says.
The truth
So they feel higher fuel prices without the stock market gains, the economist says.
What comes next
GasBuddy warns that new fighting after the vote could lift prices before Thanksgiving.
Who gains
US oil and gas companies
Their earnings have more than doubled from a year ago as fuel prices climbed.
Who pays
US drivers and farmers
Americans have spent about $145 billion more on fuel since 1 March, and diesel is up about 70% in a year.
Nobody knows yet
Whether US fuel prices fall after Tuesday's vote.
GasBuddy says new fighting with Iran after the vote could push prices up again before Thanksgiving.
Part of a signal
Fuel kept dear by the Iran war
Seen in 3 of the 12 beats
Also seen in World and Finance.
The war keeps oil dear, and the cost moves down the chain to whoever buys fuel.
The whole signal →2 sources
US fuel heads for its dearest election day
The full story
US fuel heads for its dearest election day
US petrol averaged $4.20 a gallon on Friday, nearly 40% more than a year ago.
Why it matters. ExxonMobil's chief says diesel is the key pressure point because the economy runs on it.
US workers' share of income hits a record low
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
US workers got 52.8% of the country's income in the spring, the lowest since 1947.
The figure counts wages and salaries as a share of everything the economy produces.
It was 53.6% the quarter before, and has averaged about 55.6% this decade.
Who is involved
The Bureau of Labor Statistics, the US government's jobs counter, publishes it.
Fortune 500 companies made a record $2.1 trillion in profit in 2025.
The US added just 29,000 jobs in September.
Who is involved
Raymond Robertson
labour economist, Texas A&M
Labour economist Raymond Robertson links the fall to machines and software replacing workers.
Why it matters
When workers' share falls, more of each dollar of output goes to company owners.
How it works
Economists call this the labour share: the slice of national income paid as wages.
The truth
Morgan Stanley economists say it is still an open question whether AI is the cause.
Who gains
Big US companies' owners
Fortune 500 profits hit a record $2.1 trillion in 2025 while workers' share of income fell to a record low.
Nobody knows yet
Whether AI is behind the fall in US workers' share of income.
One economist points to automation, while Morgan Stanley economists say the cause is still an open question.
1 source
US workers' share of income hits a record low
The full story
US workers' share of income hits a record low
US workers got 52.8% of the country's income in the spring, the lowest since 1947.
Why it matters. When workers' share falls, more of each dollar of output goes to company owners.
Fewer small 401(k) pots are cashed out
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
Vanguard, a big US fund firm, studied what happens to small 401(k) pots.
Who is involved
A 401(k) is a US workplace retirement savings account.
With automatic transfers, cash-outs of pots under $1,000 fell from about 50% to 9%.
The system moves a leaver's pot into a holding account until their new plan joins.
But only 6% of the moved pots have reached a new employer's plan.
1.22 million people are waiting to be matched with a new plan.
The median pot moved was $200, and the typical saver earned about $20,000 a year.
A second Vanguard study looked at new retirees aged 60 to 72.
80% of them left their 401(k) untouched for a year after retiring.
Why it matters
Cashing out before 59 and a half can mean income tax and a 10% penalty.
How it works
Faced with too many choices, many retirees simply do nothing, Vanguard's report finds.
The truth
Fees on the holding accounts can slowly eat small pots while they wait, Vanguard says.
Good news
About 53,118 automatic transfers have moved $71.3 million into workers' new plans.
Nobody knows yet
When the 1.22 million waiting 401(k) pots reach their owners' new plans.
A pot moves only when the new employer joins the transfer network, and few have.
Good news
Where employers moved small 401(k) pots automatically when a worker left, the share cashed out fell from about half to 9%, Vanguard found.
The full story
Fewer small 401(k) pots are cashed out
Vanguard, a big US fund firm, studied what happens to small 401(k) pots.
Why it matters. Cashing out before 59 and a half can mean income tax and a 10% penalty.
SpaceX's president gives shares to poorer children
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
Gwynne Shotwell, SpaceX's president, will give over 2 million SpaceX shares to children.
Who is involved
SpaceX is Elon Musk's rocket company.
The shares go into Trump Accounts, US government savings accounts for children under 18.
The first gift is for 11 to 17-year-olds where median family income is $57,000 or less.
Why it matters
The gifts are meant for low-income communities, the Shotwells say.
Eligible families get a notice by Monday, 2 November.
Who is involved
Military families abroad
Children in foster care
A second gift covers children in military families abroad and in foster care, among others.
How it got here
Elon Musk said this month he would give one share to every child in America.
How it got here
Michael and Susan Dell gave $6.25 billion to Trump Accounts last December.
The truth
The donor chooses who gets shares: the second gift favours counties near the Shotwells' Texas home.
What comes next
By 2 November
families get a notice
December
shares reach accounts
Shotwell says the shares will reach children's accounts in December.
Good news
Children in poorer zip codes will own shares in SpaceX by Christmas.
Who gains
Children in poorer US zip codes
They get SpaceX shares in their Trump Accounts in December, from Gwynne Shotwell's gift.
1 source
SpaceX's president gives shares to poorer children
The full story
SpaceX's president gives shares to poorer children
Gwynne Shotwell, SpaceX's president, will give over 2 million SpaceX shares to children.
Why it matters. The gifts are meant for low-income communities, the Shotwells say.
Japan moves to cut its tax on food
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
Japan's lower house began debating a bill on 20 October to cut the tax on food.
Japan's consumption tax, a sales tax, on food would fall from 8% to 1%.
Sanae Takaichi
Japan's prime minister
The cut would last two years from April 2027, Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi said.
How it got here
1989
consumption tax begins
April 2027
food tax cut to 1%
It would be the first cut to the tax since it began in 1989.
The cut would cost Japan's government an estimated 4.4 trillion yen in tax.
How it got here
Every major party in February's election promised to cut or scrap the food tax.
How it got here
Japan's government chose 1%, not 0%, because shop tills cannot easily charge zero.
Why it matters
Prices in Japan rose 2.1% in the year to September, the most this year.
Who is involved
IMF
International Monetary Fund
The IMF, which checks countries' finances, told Japan in February not to cut the tax.
How it works
The IMF calls it untargeted: it reaches every buyer, not only those in need.
Why it matters
Japan's government debt is about 204% of its economy, the IMF projects.
The truth
Takaichi says she will not borrow to pay for it, but has given few details.
How it works
Every voter buys food, so every major party in February's election promised to cut the food tax.
The idea, in story 2: Why voters back taxes that land on someone else →Who pays
Japan's public finances
The food tax cut would cost an estimated 4.4 trillion yen, in a country whose debt is about 204% of its economy.
Nobody knows yet
How Japan will pay for its food tax cut.
Takaichi says she will not borrow for it, but Japan's government has given few details of what it will cut instead.
4 sources
Japan moves to cut its tax on food
- 22Japan core inflation in September surges to its highest this year at 2.1%
- 23Takaichi's fiscal push could lift growth - and Japan's already-rising interest bill
- 24'Embarrassment for Japan': PM wants to cut sales tax but cash registers say no
- 25IMF urges Japan to keep raising rates, avoid reducing sales tax
The full story
Japan moves to cut its tax on food
Japan's lower house began debating a bill on 20 October to cut the tax on food.
Why it matters. Prices in Japan rose 2.1% in the year to September, the most this year.
Pakistan's cooking gas rises again
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
Pakistan's regulator raised the official price of cooking gas again for November.
Who is involved
LPG, liquefied petroleum gas, is sold to homes in cylinders for cooking.
An 11.8kg household cylinder now officially costs 3,470 rupees, up 173 rupees.
In the open market, LPG sells for up to 630 rupees a kilo, against 294 officially.
How it works
The official price follows Saudi Aramco's export price and the dollar.
How it got here
7 of 10
7 in 10 cylinders' worth came from Iran
Distributors say about 70% of Pakistan's LPG came from Iran, whose border is closed.
Why it matters
Many in the trade warn the crisis will deepen because of the gas shortage.
What comes next
LPG sellers threaten to strike from 16 November over a new government policy.
The truth
Families who buy on the open market pay up to about twice the official rate.
Who gains
Open-market LPG sellers in Pakistan
They sell cooking gas at up to 630 rupees a kilo, against an official 294, while supply from Iran is cut off.
The full story
Pakistan's cooking gas rises again
Pakistan's regulator raised the official price of cooking gas again for November.
Why it matters. Many in the trade warn the crisis will deepen because of the gas shortage.
Volunteers pack Diwali food hampers
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
About 300 volunteers packed Diwali food hampers in Birmingham, England, on Saturday.
Who is involved
Diwali is a religious festival that celebrates light over darkness, the organiser says.
The Diwali Foundation, a charity, says more than 12% of UK households face food poverty.
It has given out about 23,470 hampers so far.
It aims to give out 6,000 hampers this year.
Who is involved
Parcels went to tenants of Walsall Housing Group, a housing provider.
Why it matters
“It's really tough out there”
The housing group says "It's really tough out there" for its tenants.
Good news
An 80-year-old resident called his parcel unbelievable.
Good news
About 300 volunteers in Birmingham packed Diwali food hampers on Saturday for tenants of a local housing group, and the charity behind them has now given out about 23,470.
The full story
Volunteers pack Diwali food hampers
About 300 volunteers packed Diwali food hampers in Birmingham, England, on Saturday.
Why it matters. The housing group says "It's really tough out there" for its tenants.
That's the whole Money day.
13 stories, 27 sources.