Friday, 18 September 2026
Friday, 18 September 2026
- In brief
- 1NASA's Moon orbiter found the largest new crater ever seen. A rock hit the Moon in 2024, and nobody noticed for more than a year.
- 2Starship's first orbit try moves to 28 September
- 3The youngest planet yet, found in old pictures
- 4Roman's main camera is cold and working
- 5The Sun may have swallowed a planet
18 Sept · Space · In brief
Space · Friday, 18 September 2026
Space, in brief
5 stories · 11 sources
Swipe up for the day in brief ↑Scroll down for the day in brief ↓
What is moving · 1 of 3
Finds hiding in old pictures
NASA's Moon orbiter photographed the new crater in 2024, but nobody flagged it until August 2025.
What is moving · 2 of 3
Models meeting a case they missed
Planet-building models did not expect a planet younger than a million years.
What is moving · 3 of 3
New telescopes getting ready
NASA's Roman telescope turned on its 300-megapixel main camera on 11 September.
5 stories
- 1NASA's Moon orbiter found the largest new crater ever seen. A rock hit the Moon in 2024, and nobody noticed for more than a year.
- 2Starship's first orbit try moves to 28 September
- 3The youngest planet yet, found in old pictures
- 4Roman's main camera is cold and working
- 5The Sun may have swallowed a planet
6 sources
Space, in brief
- 2A new 222-m diameter lunar crater
- 4NASA spacecraft discovers a huge new crater on the moon
- 8Newfound 'Baby' Planet Smashes Record for Youngest Known World
- 9Scientists find youngest exoplanet on record - a 'newborn' named Elias
- 10Roman Space Telescope starts waking up as NASA powers on instruments for the 1st time
- 11The sun may once have swallowed a super-Earth planet and could still be hiding the evidence
NASA's Moon orbiter found the largest new crater ever seen. A rock hit the Moon in 2024, and nobody noticed for more than a year.
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
A space rock hit the Moon between 11 April and 22 May 2024.
It dug a crater 222 metres wide and 43 metres deep.
Who is involved
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO)
a NASA spacecraft that has mapped the Moon since 2009; its cameras photographed the spot before and after the hit
Who is involved
Robert Wagner
an image specialist at Intuitive Machines, a Texas space company, who works on LRO's pictures; he spotted the new crater
Why it matters
The teams now treat McGetchin as a starting point, so the next thing to watch is how fast LRO's pictures show its bright splash and cold patch fading.
What's really going on
A space rock the size of a small building hit the Moon in spring 2024, and no telescope saw it.
What's really going on
NASA's Moon orbiter had pictures of the spot from before and after, and a scientist found the new crater more than a year later during a routine check of the data.
Why it works on people
The phrase once in a century makes the crater sound as if it was due. The 132-year figure is an average from models, and an average does not say which year the next big hit will come.
Who gains
Intuitive Machines, a Texas space company
Its staff run image work for LRO's cameras, so the find and one of the two papers carry its scientists' names.
Who gains
Engineers planning rovers and bases on the Moon
They now have a measured case of how far one big fresh hit disturbs the ground and changes how it holds heat.
Nobody knows yet
How far the rock and dust from McGetchin actually flew.
The Associated Press reports more than 100 kilometres and New Scientist more than 120. The paper itself gives the reach only as more than 1,000 times the crater's radius.
Nobody knows yet
Whether the rate of once every 132 years is right.
The figure comes from crater models. LRO has watched for only 17 years, and one big crater in that time cannot test the rate on its own.
Nobody knows yet
Whether it was an asteroid or a comet, and exactly how big.
The paper says a fragment of either. NASA gives the rock's size only as a range, three to six storeys tall.
Nobody knows yet
The day of the hit.
LRO's pictures only narrow it to between 11 April and 22 May 2024, and no telescope caught the flash.
Good news
A scientist checking NASA's Moon pictures for errors found the largest new crater ever seen, 222 metres across, and two teams have now measured how far its rock flew and how it changed the ground.
The short version
That's the story in short.
The whole story has 15 more parts.
or swipe up for the next storyor scroll on for the next story ↓
The whole story, in 15 parts ↓
Part 1 of 15 · Who else is involved
Mark Robinson
chief scientist for LRO's cameras, at Intuitive Machines; led the study of the crater and how far its rock flew
Part 1 of 15 · Who else is involved
Tyler Powell and David Paige
scientists at Johns Hopkins University and the University of California, Los Angeles; they measured the cold patch around the crater
Part 2 of 15 · How it unfolded
Late 2025
LRO takes sharper pictures and night-time heat readings of the site.
Early 2026
The discovery is confirmed.
Part 3 of 15
It is the largest newly formed crater found anywhere in the solar system.
Part 3 of 15
The previous record for a new crater on the Moon was 70 metres wide.
Part 4 of 15
The rock was a piece of an asteroid or a comet.
Part 4 of 15
NASA says it was possibly the size of a three- to six-storey building.
Part 5 of 15
No telescope on Earth or in space saw the hit happen.
Part 5 of 15
NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), a spacecraft that has circled the Moon since 2009, had photographed the spot before and after.
Part 6 of 15
LRO's wide camera photographs the whole Moon every month.
Part 6 of 15
Comparing two months taken under similar sunlight shows what has changed.
Part 7 of 15
Robert Wagner, an image specialist at Intuitive Machines, a Texas space company, noticed a bright patch with a dark ring around it during a routine check of the data.
Part 8 of 15
The pictures were not flagged until August 2025, more than a year after the hit.
Part 9 of 15
Models say a hit this big should strike the Moon about once every 132 years.
Part 10 of 15
The crash threw dust and rock more than 100 kilometres across the surface, and at a steeper angle than scientists expected.
Part 11 of 15
A second team found a patch 7 kilometres wide around the crater that is about 9 degrees Celsius colder at night.
Part 11 of 15
The hit fluffed up the soil, so it now loses heat faster.
Part 12 of 15
The crater sits near the Moon's eastern edge, just inside the rim of a huge old basin called Crisium, where dark lava plains meet brighter highlands.
Part 13 of 15
LRO has found at least 1,000 new craters in 17 years.
Part 13 of 15
Most are far smaller, and the smallest it can pick out are about 9 metres wide.
Part 14 of 15
The two studies came out on 16 September in the journal Science Advances.
Part 14 of 15
The crater is named after Thomas McGetchin, a former director of the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston.
Part 15 of 15
The scientists say knowing how far a big hit disturbs the ground will help plan where rovers drive and where astronauts build.
5 sources
NASA's Moon orbiter found the largest new crater ever seen. A rock hit the Moon in 2024, and nobody noticed for more than a year.
- 1A NASA spacecraft just found a giant new crater on the moon. Here's why everyone's talking about the 'once-in-a-century' discovery
- 2A new 222-m diameter lunar crater
- 3NASA's Moon Orbiter Spots New, 'Once-in-Century' Moon Crater
- 4NASA spacecraft discovers a huge new crater on the moon
- 5Asteroid hit the moon and flung rocks 120 kilometres from the crater
The full story
NASA's Moon orbiter found the largest new crater ever seen. A rock hit the Moon in 2024, and nobody noticed for more than a year.
A space rock hit the Moon between 11 April and 22 May 2024. It dug a crater 222 metres wide and 43 metres deep.
It is the largest newly formed crater found anywhere in the solar system. The previous record for a new crater on the Moon was 70 metres wide.
The rock was a piece of an asteroid or a comet. NASA says it was possibly the size of a three- to six-storey building.
No telescope on Earth or in space saw the hit happen.
LRO's wide camera photographs the whole Moon every month. Comparing two months taken under similar sunlight shows what has changed.
Robert Wagner, an image specialist at Intuitive Machines, a Texas space company, noticed a bright patch with a dark ring around it during a routine check of the data.
The pictures were not flagged until August 2025, more than a year after the hit.
Models say a hit this big should strike the Moon about once every 132 years.
The crash threw dust and rock more than 100 kilometres across the surface, and at a steeper angle than scientists expected.
A second team found a patch 7 kilometres wide around the crater that is about 9 degrees Celsius colder at night. The hit fluffed up the soil, so it now loses heat faster.
The crater sits near the Moon's eastern edge, just inside the rim of a huge old basin called Crisium, where dark lava plains meet brighter highlands.
LRO has found at least 1,000 new craters in 17 years. Most are far smaller, and the smallest it can pick out are about 9 metres wide.
The two studies came out on 16 September in the journal Science Advances.
The scientists say knowing how far a big hit disturbs the ground will help plan where rovers drive and where astronauts build.
Why it matters. The teams now treat McGetchin as a starting point, so the next thing to watch is how fast LRO's pictures show its bright splash and cold patch fading.
Starship's first orbit try moves to 28 September
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
SpaceX said on 17 September that its first try at flying Starship into orbit moves to 28 September, six days later than planned.
Starship is the giant reusable rocket SpaceX is building for the Moon and Mars. Its 13 earlier flights all stopped just short of orbit.
This flight is meant to circle Earth six times about 275 kilometres up, release 26 larger Starlink internet satellites, and come down in the Pacific west of Chile about 10 hours after launch.
Why it matters
SpaceX says reaching orbit has to come first before it can start reusing the whole rocket quickly.
Why it matters
The booster will again splash into the Gulf of Mexico, after the last one in July had ice clog three engines and hit the water hard.
Who gains
SpaceX's Starlink network
The first orbital Starship flight is also the first to carry the larger V3 Starlink satellites, which only Starship can launch.
Who pays
SpaceX
Its first V3 Starlink satellites wait at least six more days to reach orbit.
Nobody knows yet
Why SpaceX moved Starship's first orbital try from 22 to 28 September.
The company announced the new date on 17 September and gave no explanation.
Nobody knows yet
Whether the Starship flight has the approval it needs.
When SpaceX set the first date, it said the flight was pending a regulator's approval. The update moving the date did not say whether that had come.
2 sources
Starship's first orbit try moves to 28 September
The full story
Starship's first orbit try moves to 28 September
SpaceX said on 17 September that its first try at flying Starship into orbit moves to 28 September, six days later than planned.
Why it matters. SpaceX says reaching orbit has to come first before it can start reusing the whole rocket quickly.
The youngest planet yet, found in old pictures
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
Astronomers confirmed a planet less than a million years old, the youngest ever found, in a study out on 16 September.
The planet, Elias 2-24 b, is about as heavy as Jupiter.
It sits 450 light-years away, in a gap in the dusty disc around its young star, where earlier telescopes had hinted a planet might be.
A team led by Andrea Bernardi, in Chile, found it in old images from the Keck Observatory in Hawaii.
The youngest planets known before were all over 5 million years old.
Why it matters
Planet-building models already struggled to explain the older record holders, co-author Lucas Cieza said, and this one shows they are missing some steps.
Why it matters
The authors expect NASA's Roman telescope, which carries an instrument that blocks out starlight, to find planets like this more easily.
How it works
How scientists can say a crater this big comes once every 132 years
How it works
Small rocks hit the Moon every year and leave craters that can be counted. Scientists stretch that count to the rare big hit, and McGetchin now tests it.
How it works · step 1 of 5
Small rocks hit the Moon every year, and each one leaves a crater that can be seen and counted
How it works · step 2 of 5
Small hits are common and big hits are rare, and the counts fall in a steady pattern as the craters get bigger
How it works · step 3 of 5
Scientists stretch that pattern to sizes nobody has watched form
How it works · step 4 of 5
That gives a rate for the rare big hit: a crater of 222 metres about once every 132 years
How it works · step 5 of 5
When a big one finally turns up, it is a test of the pattern, not just a record
The twist
Nobody watched the Moon for 132 years to get that figure. It comes from models built on counts of craters, most of them small.
The twist
McGetchin is the first big new crater that can show whether the pattern holds at the big end.
Seen the same day
Planet-building models were built from many older planets, and one planet under a million years old is a case they did not predict, so it now tests them.
Seen the same day
Models of how stars like the Sun age are built from many stars, and the Sun's own measured insides do not quite fit, so the gap is where the swallowed-planet idea comes from.
The catch
One crater in 17 years of watching fits a once-in-132-years rate. It would also fit a rate several times higher, so one event cannot settle it.
The whole
Engineers planning rovers and bases on the Moon will use this crater to learn how far a big hit disturbs the ground.
The whole
Towns beside rivers are planned around the same kind of count for floods.
The whole
In both cases the big event has been seen only a few times, and the plan rests on the many small ones.
Who gains
Astronomers who use old telescope archives
The youngest planet ever found came from images already sitting in the Keck Observatory's archive.
Who pays
Scientists who build models of how planets form
Their models now have to explain a Jupiter-sized planet less than a million years old.
Nobody knows yet
How a planet as heavy as Jupiter formed in under a million years.
Co-author Lucas Cieza says even the best planet-building models are missing some steps, and the study does not say which.
Good news
Astronomers found the youngest planet yet, less than a million years old, in pictures that had sat in the Keck Observatory's archive in Hawaii.
2 sources
The youngest planet yet, found in old pictures
The full story
The youngest planet yet, found in old pictures
Astronomers confirmed a planet less than a million years old, the youngest ever found, in a study out on 16 September.
Why it matters. Planet-building models already struggled to explain the older record holders, co-author Lucas Cieza said, and this one shows they are missing some steps.
Roman's main camera is cold and working
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
NASA's Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, launched on 30 August, has turned on its main camera for the first time.
The Wide Field Instrument is a 300-megapixel camera for infrared light, the heat glow our eyes cannot see.
On 11 September they turned off a heater so it could cool to about minus 143 degrees Celsius, cold enough to turn its detectors on.
On 13 September the team confirmed the parts that focus it were working.
Why it matters
Roman's second instrument, which blocks a star's light to see its planets, passed its first remote tests and will now spend 30 days letting water and chemicals leave its surfaces.
Why it matters
The telescope still has about 12 weeks to go before it reaches its working spot far beyond the Moon, and science starts after another month of tests.
Who gains
Planet hunters waiting for Roman
Its main camera and its starlight-blocking instrument have both passed their first tests in space.
Who pays
The team running Roman's starlight-blocking instrument
It must sit idle for 30 days while water and chemicals leave its surfaces before more tests.
Nobody knows yet
When Roman starts its science.
Its instruments need about another month of tests, and the telescope is still about 12 weeks from its working orbit. No start date is given.
Good news
NASA's Roman telescope cooled its main camera to about minus 143 degrees Celsius and turned it on, and the first readings from its parts came back as expected.
1 source
Roman's main camera is cold and working
The full story
Roman's main camera is cold and working
NASA's Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, launched on 30 August, has turned on its main camera for the first time.
Why it matters. Roman's second instrument, which blocks a star's light to see its planets, passed its first remote tests and will now spend 30 days letting water and chemicals leave its surfaces.
The Sun may have swallowed a planet
Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓
A study published on 10 September suggests the Sun may have swallowed a planet five to ten times heavier than Earth early in its life.
The team, led by Mutlu Yildiz of Ege University in Turkey, ran computer models of how the Sun has aged.
Adding a swallowed planet helped explain three things the usual models get slightly wrong.
They are how deep the Sun's churning outer layer goes, how fast sound travels just below it, and why its surface holds so little lithium.
Why it matters
Planets a few times heavier than Earth are common around other stars, and our solar system has none, so this would be one reason why.
Why it matters
It is still only a model: the authors say something else could explain the gaps, and the next step is to look for the planet's chemical mark inside the Sun.
How it works
Models of how stars like the Sun age are built from many stars, and the Sun's own measured insides do not quite fit, so the gap is where the swallowed-planet idea comes from.
The idea, in story 3: How scientists can say a crater this big comes once every 132 years →Who pays
Scientists who build standard models of the Sun
The new study suggests their models may be missing a swallowed planet, an idea they now have to test.
Nobody knows yet
Whether the Sun really swallowed a planet.
The idea comes from computer models, and the authors say something else could explain the same gaps. They say the next step is to look for the planet's chemical mark inside the Sun.
1 source
The Sun may have swallowed a planet
The full story
The Sun may have swallowed a planet
A study published on 10 September suggests the Sun may have swallowed a planet five to ten times heavier than Earth early in its life.
Why it matters. Planets a few times heavier than Earth are common around other stars, and our solar system has none, so this would be one reason why.
That's the whole Space day.
5 stories, 11 sources.