Day Lila
Day Lila

Wednesday, 30 September 2026

30 Sept · Biotech · In brief

Biotech · Wednesday, 30 September 2026

Biotech, in brief

14 stories · 17 sources

Swipe up for the day in brief ↑Scroll down for the day in brief ↓

What is moving · 1 of 3

Two firms chasing weight-loss sales

High ↑

Novo paid $300 million for a once-a-week pill that no person has taken yet. [1] In Milan, Novo said people who raised their Ozempic dose had a lower risk of heart events than people who switched to Lilly's Mounjaro. [6] Lilly said its daily pill beat Novo's, using two older trials. [7]

What is moving · 2 of 3

Drugs compared without a shared trial

Building ↑

The Dutch company uniQure measured its Huntington's treatment against a database of untreated patients, and over half of its four-year records are missing. [4] A Lilly-funded study set Zepbound against Wegovy using two separate trials. [8] An eye study in Italy switched 30 patients to another drug with no comparison group. [16]

What is moving · 3 of 3

Getting genes into the right cells

Building ↑

A gene-therapy virus was built to stay switched off until the liver, light or injury chemicals unlock it, in mice. [12] New fat bubbles carried long gene-editing messages up to four times better in mice. [13] Rewriting one short run of letters stopped a misreading caused by a modified letter used in mRNA vaccines. [14]

Novo Nordisk pays China's Hengrui $300 million up front, and up to $2.6 billion, for a once-a-week weight-loss pill no person has taken yet

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Novo Nordisk, the Danish maker of the weight-loss drug Wegovy, will pay $300 million up front to Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals for an experimental weight-loss drug called HRS-1596. [1][2]

Novo and Lilly both think pills can reach people who avoid injections [2]

Who is involved

Who is involved

Why it matters

Watch the first human trial in China.

Why it matters

It is the first test of whether a once-a-week pill of this kind is safe in people, and Novo has given no dates for its own trials. [1][2]

What's really going on

Novo Nordisk has lost ground to Eli Lilly, and it is buying drugs that other companies invented: on Tuesday it paid $300 million up front for a Chinese pill no person has taken yet. [3][1]

Who gains

It collects $300 million now for a drug no one has taken, and keeps the rights in mainland China, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan. [2][1]

Who pays

It pays $300 million before any person has taken the drug, with up to $2.3 billion more to follow if it works. [1][2]

Nobody knows yet

Whether HRS-1596 works, or is safe, in people.

No one has taken it yet, and a Leerink Partners analyst said there is little data to judge it. [3] Novo gave no dates for its own trials. [2]

Part of a signal

Companies testing their own products

Also seen in Tech.

The whole signal →

Part of a signal

The race to sell weight-loss drugs

Also seen in Mind & body.

The whole signal →

The short version

That's the story in short.

The whole story has 12 more parts.

or swipe up for the next storyor scroll on for the next story ↓

The whole story, in 12 parts ↓

Part 1 of 12 · Who else is involved

Part 1 of 12 · Who else is involved

Part 2 of 12

Hengrui can earn up to $2.3 billion more if the drug passes later tests and sells.

Part 2 of 12

That would take the deal to as much as $2.6 billion. [2][1]

Part 3 of 12

Hengrui is China's largest drugmaker by stock-market value.

Part 3 of 12

It announced the deal on Tuesday. [2]

Part 4 of 12

No person has taken the drug yet.

Part 4 of 12

China's regulator has cleared it for a phase 1 trial, the first small test of safety in people. [1][2]

Part 5 of 12

It is designed as a pill taken once a week.

Part 5 of 12

The weight-loss pills sold now, Novo's Wegovy pill and Eli Lilly's Foundayo, are taken every day. [2][1]

Part 6 of 12

Like Lilly's injection Zepbound, it copies two gut hormones, GLP-1 and GIP.

Part 6 of 12

They curb appetite and help the body handle sugar. [1][3]

Part 7 of 12

Novo gets the rights everywhere except mainland China, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan.

Part 7 of 12

It says it will run trials around the world, but gave no dates. [2]

Part 8 of 12

Novo has lost ground to Lilly in weight-loss drugs.

Part 8 of 12

It has installed a new chief executive, laid off thousands of workers and bought other companies' experimental drugs. [3]

Part 9 of 12

Earlier this month it bought three experimental obesity drugs from the biotech company Kallyope. [3]

Part 9 of 12

Last week it agreed a 1.17 billion euro deal for Nanexa's way of making injections last longer. [1]

Part 10 of 12

Hengrui has signed six licensing deals with US or European drugmakers since the start of 2025, more than any other Chinese drug company, by BioPharma Dive's count. [3]

Part 11 of 12

Hengrui's obesity drugs are also the base of the startup Kailera Therapeutics, whose first sale of shares in April set a record. [1][3]

Part 12 of 12

A Leerink Partners analyst said Kailera may have had the right to buy this drug first.

Part 12 of 12

He also said there is little data to judge it before tests in people. [3]

Huntington's gene therapy weakens at four years

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

The Dutch company uniQure said on Tuesday that its one-time gene therapy AMT-130 slowed Huntington's disease by 44% after four years in 12 high-dose patients. [4][5]

Huntington's is an inherited disease that destroys nerve cells. [5] The 44% was measured against a database of untreated patients, and it was not statistically significant, so chance could explain it. [5]

At three years uniQure had reported 75%. [4] A second score, for daily tasks such as managing money, held at 61%, against 60% a year earlier. [4]

Why it matters

The US drug regulator is reviewing uniQure's request for early approval, filed this month on the three-year data. [4]

Why it matters

Shares fell about 40% on Tuesday, and uniQure says the database lost its fastest-declining patients, which makes its drug look weaker. [4][5]

How it works

A treatment that works at first still has to show it keeps working

How it works

A result is measured at one moment, so whether a benefit lasts is a separate question that only years of following the same patients can answer.

How it works · step 1 of 5

A trial checks a benefit at set times, such as one year and three years

How it works · step 2 of 5

The first good number is the one regulators and buyers act on

How it works · step 3 of 5

The disease keeps going, and the body, the cancer or the drug's effect can change

How it works · step 4 of 5

Each year some patients stop coming back, so later numbers rest on fewer people

How it works · step 5 of 5

Only following the same patients for more years shows whether the benefit lasts

The twist

A treatment can show it works within a year or two.

The twist

Showing that the benefit lasts takes years more with the same patients, and fewer of them stay in the study each year.

The picture

How much uniQure says AMT-130 slowed Huntington's, on two scores. The overall score fell between year three and year four; the daily-life score held.

Seen the same day

uniQure's Huntington's gene therapy

The overall score showed 75% slowing at three years and 44% at four, and more than half the comparison group's four-year records are missing.

Seen the same day

Years of drugs after a late transplant

Doctors followed 13 myeloma patients for a median of about four years to learn how long the drugs held the cancer back: 45.1 months for half of them.

Seen the same day

Roche pill tried on repair-fault cancers

Tumours that shrank stayed smaller for a median of 10.2 months so far, and some responses were still going, so how long they last is not yet known.

The catch

A smaller number in a later year does not always mean the treatment faded.

The catch

If the sickest people drop out of the comparison group, that group looks healthier, and the gap shrinks even when the treatment holds.

The whole

The 12 people in uniQure's high-dose group have been examined for four years so that others with Huntington's can learn whether the treatment lasts.

The whole

Anyone offered a new medicine relies on strangers like them, who kept coming back to be checked.

Who pays

The shares fell about 40% at Tuesday's open on the four-year data. [4][5]

Who pays

The therapy under US review now carries a weaker, disputed four-year result into that review. [4][5]

Nobody knows yet

Whether uniQure's treatment is fading, or its comparison group changed.

Against the updated database the four-year slowing is 44% and not statistically significant; against the old database, uniQure's after-the-fact analysis gives 54%. [4][5] More than half the four-year comparison records are missing, and Guggenheim analysts say one outlier caused about a third of the drop. [4]

Nobody knows yet

Which three-year number for uniQure is the right one.

Fierce Biotech reports the 75% slowing uniQure announced a year ago. [4] BioPharma Dive reports a fresh three-year analysis of 15 patients showing 80%. [5] Neither source says how the two analyses relate, and we could not check it.

Nobody knows yet

Whether the US regulator will judge uniQure on the three-year or the four-year data.

uniQure filed on the three-year data, and its chief medical officer said it is hard to say whether the regulator will rerun the analysis. [4] A decision could come about eight months after filing. [5]

Novo's records favour Ozempic over a switch

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Novo Nordisk said on Tuesday that health records from 636,525 adults with type 2 diabetes showed a 6% lower risk of serious heart and blood-vessel events in people who raised their Ozempic dose. [6]

They were compared with people who switched to Mounjaro, the rival drug from Eli Lilly. [6]

Within 720 days, 36.9% had raised their Ozempic dose to 2 mg and only 5.7% had switched. [6] The results were shown at the European diabetes meeting in Milan. [6]

  • Stayed on 1 mg57.4%
  • Raised the dose to 2 mg36.9%
  • Switched to Mounjaro5.7%
What the 636,525 adults on Ozempic 1 mg did within 720 days. The Mounjaro group Novo compared against is the thin slice.

Why it matters

This was a study of records, not a trial, so nobody decided by chance who switched and who stayed.

Why it matters

Novo and Lilly are fighting over a US obesity market that analysts put at $100 billion to $150 billion by 2030. [6]

Who gains

Its own records study lets it say that raising the Ozempic dose came with 6% lower heart risk than switching to Mounjaro. [6]

Nobody knows yet

Whether Ozempic really carries less heart risk than a switch to Mounjaro.

Novo's 6% figure comes from health records, not a trial, and only 5.7% of the people switched. [6] The report does not say who chose to switch, or why.

Lilly says its pill beats Novo's

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Eli Lilly said on Tuesday that its daily weight-loss pill Foundayo lowered weight and blood sugar more than a higher, 25 mg dose of Novo's Ozempic pill, in adults with type 2 diabetes. [7]

The two pills were never tested in one trial. Lilly compared results from two earlier late-stage studies. [7]

It put Foundayo ahead by 1.5% to 2.4% more weight lost, and by 0.3% to 0.6% more off HbA1c, a measure of average blood sugar. [7]

Why it matters

Novo said people with type 2 diabetes lose less weight in studies than people with obesity alone. [7]

Why it matters

Its 25 mg pill is not yet approved in the US for diabetes, and it expects a decision by the end of 2026. [7]

What's really going on

The same day, Novo and Lilly each put out a comparison in which its own drug came out ahead, and neither came from a trial that gave both drugs to one group of patients. [6][7]

Who gains

A comparison it built from two older trials puts its daily pill ahead of Novo's on weight and blood sugar. [7]

Nobody knows yet

Whether Foundayo beats the Ozempic pill in people with obesity.

Lilly's comparison lined up two separate diabetes trials, and Novo says people with type 2 diabetes lose less weight. [7] No trial has given both pills to one group.

A no-fasting diabetes pill passes a final test

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

A phase 3 trial, the large final stage of testing, at 46 sites in China tried safiglipron, a daily pill that copies the gut hormone GLP-1. [9]

It can be taken with food, at any time of day. [9] The 284 adults had early type 2 diabetes, managed with diet and exercise alone. [9]

After 32 weeks, HbA1c, a measure of average blood sugar, fell 1.20 to 1.45 points more than on a dummy pill. [9]

Share of people who reached the usual blood-sugar target after 32 weeks.

Between 71.4% and 77.8% reached the usual target, against 25% on the dummy. [9]

Why it matters

The trial's main measure was blood sugar, and weight fell only 0.65% to 3.56% more than on the dummy. [9]

Why it matters

Side effects made 6.9% stop on the highest dose, against none on the dummy. [9]

Good news

In a trial at 46 sites in China, between 71% and 78% of people with early type 2 diabetes who took a daily pill, safiglipron, reached the usual blood-sugar target after 32 weeks. On a dummy pill, 25% did.

BioNTech closes three German sites

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

BioNTech, the German company that first developed the COVID vaccine it sells with Pfizer, said on Monday it will close its sites in Idar-Oberstein, Marburg and Tuebingen. [10]

It had tried since May to sell them, while moving its COVID vaccine production to Pfizer. [10] No buyer was found. [10]

The wider plan, which also covered a site in Singapore, affects up to 1,860 jobs. [10]

Why it matters

BioNTech says it has agreed redundancy terms with its works council, the body that speaks for staff. [10]

Why it matters

Its two co-founders said in March that they will leave by the end of this year to start a new company. [10]

Who pays

Idar-Oberstein, Marburg and Tuebingen will close after no buyer came forward, in a plan affecting up to 1,860 jobs. [10]

Roche pill tried on repair-fault cancers

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Roche's experimental pill RO7589831 was tested in 88 people with advanced cancers that carry MSI, a fault in how cells fix errors when they copy DNA. [11]

The pill blocks WRN, a protein that these cancer cells need to survive. [11]

Of 66 patients whose tumours could be judged, seven saw them shrink clearly, and in 74.2% growth stopped for a while. [11]

Those responses lasted a median of 10.2 months so far, and some were still going when the results were published in Nature Medicine on 29 September. [11]

Why it matters

This first test in people was about safety and dose, and nausea affected 54.5% of patients, mostly mildly. [11]

Why it matters

7 of 66

patients whose tumours shrank clearly

Seven of the 66 people whose tumours could be judged saw them shrink clearly.

MSI is found in 4% to 7% of advanced bowel cancers and 15% to 25% of advanced womb cancers, and immune drugs do not help all of those patients. [11]

How it works

Roche pill tried on repair-fault cancers

Tumours that shrank stayed smaller for a median of 10.2 months so far, and some responses were still going, so how long they last is not yet known.

The idea, in story 2: A treatment that works at first still has to show it keeps working →

Nobody knows yet

Whether Roche's WRN pill reaches its target inside tumours.

The researchers could not show it directly; blood tests and scans only suggested the drug was acting. [11]

A Lilly-paid comparison of Zepbound and Wegovy

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

A study paid for by Eli Lilly, published on 28 September in the International Journal of Obesity, compared tirzepatide, which Lilly sells as Zepbound, with Novo's semaglutide, sold as Wegovy. [8]

The two drugs were never given in one trial. The authors lined up two separate trials, each against its own dummy group. [8]

On that basis, the two higher tirzepatide doses took off 5.1 kg and 6.5 kg more than semaglutide, in adults with obesity but no diabetes. [8]

Why it matters

Six of the ten authors work for Lilly. [8]

Why it matters

Lining up two trials cannot rule out that their patients differed, which is what a trial giving both drugs to one group, split by chance, is for.

Years of drugs after a late transplant

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Doctors at the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Texas gave 13 people with myeloma, a blood cancer that had come back, the antibody daratumumab after a stem-cell transplant late in their illness. [17]

For six of them it was a second transplant, and 11 also took the pill pomalidomide. [17] The aim was to keep the cancer from coming back, a job called maintenance. [17]

After a median of about four years of follow-up, half of them had gone 45.1 months before the cancer grew again. [17] Four years after the transplant, none had died. [17]

Why it matters

The study had one group and no comparison, and it was funded by Janssen, part of Johnson & Johnson. [17]

Why it matters

Newer immune-cell treatments have challenged the place of late transplants in myeloma care. [17]

How it works

Years of drugs after a late transplant

Doctors followed 13 myeloma patients for a median of about four years to learn how long the drugs held the cancer back: 45.1 months for half of them.

The idea, in story 2: A treatment that works at first still has to show it keeps working →

Good news

Thirteen people with myeloma, a blood cancer that had come back, had a stem-cell transplant late in their illness and then years of maintenance drugs at MD Anderson in Texas. Four years after the transplant, none of them had died.

A gene-therapy virus that waits to be unlocked

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Gene therapies often use AAV, a small virus, to carry a new gene into cells, and it can land in the wrong tissue. [12]

Researchers reported on 29 September in Nature Materials a coat that stops the virus entering any cell. [12]

Different coats come off only in the liver, under near-infrared light, or where chemicals from inflamed tissue build up. [12]

In mice with a damaged heart, the virus delivered a repair gene to the heart muscle. [12]

Why it matters

It has been tested only in mice, and most results in mice are never repeated in people. [12] The aim is to put a gene only where it is needed.

Fat bubbles built for longer gene messages

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Lipid nanoparticles, tiny fat bubbles, carry mRNA into cells, but they work less well as the message gets longer, a team reported on 28 September in Nature Biotechnology. [13]

Gene-editing tools are long messages. [13] The team screened 384 fat-like molecules with a long test message and picked the best, LC-1. [13]

The best editing rates the new LC-1 bubbles reached in mice, by organ.

In mice it reached editing rates of up to 79% in the liver, 48% in the brain and 27% in the lung, up to four times the standard bubbles. [13]

Why it matters

It also carried a base editor, which changes one DNA letter, to genes including PCSK9, which affects cholesterol, and a cystic fibrosis fault. [13] All of this was in mice. [13]

Where mRNA vaccine code makes cells slip

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

COVID mRNA vaccines use a modified form of one RNA letter, called N1-methylpseudouridine, which stops the body attacking the mRNA itself and makes it last longer. [14]

Earlier studies suggested it can make the cell's protein-building machine slip one letter along and make stray protein pieces. [14]

A team reported on 28 September in Nature Communications that the slip happens at one short run of letters, UUUC. [14] Rewriting that run as UUCC or UUUU stopped it. [14]

Why it matters

The slip was measured in cells and test tubes, not in vaccinated people. [14] The authors say careful choice of letters can remove the risk from future mRNA medicines. [14]

Who gains

They get a design rule: rewriting one run of letters removes a known misreading without dropping the modified letter. [14]

Good news

Scientists found the exact run of letters, UUUC, where a modified letter used in mRNA vaccines makes cells misread the code. Rewriting that run removed the misreading.

AI helps find a glue that destroys a protein

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine used AI and a large protein screen to find molecular glues that destroy VAV1, a signalling protein in immune cells. [15]

A molecular glue sticks a target protein to the cell's own disposal system, so the cell breaks it down. [15]

Their best compound, NGT-201-18, lowered VAV1 in human T cells and calmed their activity. [15] It also destroyed a second protein, LIMD1, that it was not aimed at. [15]

Why it matters

VAV1 is linked to blood cancers and to autoimmune diseases, where the immune system attacks the body. [15]

Why it matters

The compounds have not yet been tested for safety or in animals with disease. [15]

Thirty patients switched eye drugs

Swipe up for the story ↑Scroll down for the story ↓

Doctors in Varese, Italy, moved 30 patients with wet macular degeneration from faricimab to an 8 mg dose of aflibercept. [16]

Wet macular degeneration is leaking blood vessels at the back of the eye, and a leading cause of lost sight in older people. [16]

After three monthly injections the retina was less swollen, and eyesight stayed the same. [16] Patients then went longer between injections. [16]

Why it matters

The study had no comparison group and was partly paid for by Bayer. [16]

Why it matters

Longer gaps matter because each dose is a needle into the eye, and frequent injections can make patients give up treatment. [16]

The truth, across the day

Swipe up for the truth ↑Scroll down for the truth ↓

Why it works on people

A claim that one drug beats another fits in a headline, while the way it was measured, from old records or from two separate trials, takes a paragraph to explain.

Nobody knows yet

Whether the masked virus and the new fat bubbles work in people.

Both were tested only in mice. [12][13]

That's the whole Biotech day.

14 stories, 17 sources.